{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI","short_pith_number":"pith:BZRVIV7V","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0e635457f51487471bc5731b9194e79a31da6a479cae5b394764ea69235a5dc3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1206.5833","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revision of Defeasible Logic Preferences","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Francesco Olivieri, Guido Governatori, Matteo Cristani, Simone Scannapieco","submitted_at":"2012-06-25T20:46:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are several contexts of non-monotonic reasoning where a priority between rules is established whose purpose is preventing conflicts.\n  One formalism that has been widely employed for non-monotonic reasoning is the sceptical one known as Defeasible Logic. In Defeasible Logic the tool used for conflict resolution is a preference relation between rules, that establishes the priority among them.\n  In this paper we investigate how to modify such a preference relation in a defeasible logic theory in order to change the conclusions of the theory itself. We argue that the approach we adopt is ap"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1206.5833","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2012-06-25T20:46:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"95b337e99c4fd10c10fab1ceadc65504bc1dacbe680cf6815488310d08b6656d","abstract_canon_sha256":"e94fd87dfe9bba31be1c4a8905590ecaf9942bed416a028edc81728f97fa7ef4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040736Z","signature_b64":"InLwq+Csv5xsd0pVUWuQklOzUXGNUK0aXAVx6QipRN0XAdVFx3fgs1M1juKZYk1s5+WCTvxBsawtleIjVOoVAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0e635457f51487471bc5731b9194e79a31da6a479cae5b394764ea69235a5dc3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040252Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040252Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revision of Defeasible Logic Preferences","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Francesco Olivieri, Guido Governatori, Matteo Cristani, Simone Scannapieco","submitted_at":"2012-06-25T20:46:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are several contexts of non-monotonic reasoning where a priority between rules is established whose purpose is preventing conflicts.\n  One formalism that has been widely employed for non-monotonic reasoning is the sceptical one known as Defeasible Logic. In Defeasible Logic the tool used for conflict resolution is a preference relation between rules, that establishes the priority among them.\n  In this paper we investigate how to modify such a preference relation in a defeasible logic theory in order to change the conclusions of the theory itself. We argue that the approach we adopt is ap"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1206.5833","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1206.5833","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1206.5833v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1206.5833","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BZRVIV7VCSDU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:01.376967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6F","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:01.376967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BZRVIV7V","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:01.376967+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BZRVIV7V"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BZRVIV7V","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1206.5833&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BZRVIV7VCSDUOG6FOMNZDFHHTI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040322+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:14.040322+00:00"}