{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","short_pith_number":"pith:C2H6UYBK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.12750","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","cross_cats":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Christopher Sorg","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study how exact Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) statements should be formulated for families of computational problems rather than for single problems. While the equality \\(\\mathrm{SCI}_G (\\mathcal P)=k\\) is unambiguous for an individual computational problem \\(\\mathcal P\\), the family setting requires one to distinguish family-pointwise exactness, witness-space sharpness, and worst-case exactness. We formalize this trichotomy, prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical s"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"title_canon_sha256":"bc6af03c0a69ab356acf64750a863ebcc2762364dc748ae547cf79da63c582e8","abstract_canon_sha256":"474a6d34079f38c7798fa6a6a59b1bdadb24988d63d16b465525f223ded11fce"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.921891Z","signature_b64":"EUT1kVKzx2NoNyZWKXXdK6DYppDTKINEtuaBEgivfHuF6v2atssFt89e9L3oW0880D+3v9Za+7L8SB4++iXiCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.918960Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.918960Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","cross_cats":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Christopher Sorg","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study how exact Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) statements should be formulated for families of computational problems rather than for single problems. While the equality \\(\\mathrm{SCI}_G (\\mathcal P)=k\\) is unambiguous for an individual computational problem \\(\\mathcal P\\), the family setting requires one to distinguish family-pointwise exactness, witness-space sharpness, and worst-case exactness. We formalize this trichotomy, prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical s"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The upgrade theorems and transport results rest on the assumption that the families admit decoder-regular finite-query transports and that the decoder classes satisfy the regularity conditions needed for the pullback principle to apply; this is invoked when moving from the abstract preorder to concrete families such as integration and spectral decision.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Formalizes a trichotomy of exactness notions for SCI on families, proves witness-space sharpness equals worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, supplies upgrade theorems, and illustrates with integration and spectral families.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"1494f3253d017b8061a5ebf8d28a23caad6f7b207eb37f0f30550c863bcedcd5"},"source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"25de2953-c52f-4420-9ef3-716e2c8c8baa","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T17:45:21.701451Z","strongest_claim":"We prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness.","one_line_summary":"Formalizes a trichotomy of exactness notions for SCI on families, proves witness-space sharpness equals worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, supplies upgrade theorems, and illustrates with integration and spectral families.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The upgrade theorems and transport results rest on the assumption that the families admit decoder-regular finite-query transports and that the decoder classes satisfy the regularity conditions needed for the pullback principle to apply; this is invoked when moving from the abstract preorder to concrete families such as integration and spectral decision.","pith_extraction_headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families"},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.12750/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":11,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2015,"title":"Computing spectra--on the solvability complexity index hierarchy and towers of algorithms","work_id":"73652e4a-a445-4a7e-819e-a2e123411869","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Colbrook and Anders C","work_id":"1c782bcf-f11c-40d3-86d9-6f36b1706081","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1984,"title":"Davis and Philip Rabinowitz","work_id":"83a3a204-0419-4f3c-aae9-03f1255756a0","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2011,"title":"On the solvability complexity index, the -pseudospectrum and approximations of spectra of operators","work_id":"7be73212-eeb9-4d2b-b86e-4e320003990e","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1995,"title":"Perturbation theory for linear operators","work_id":"b27acd16-892a-4118-8328-359994702800","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":11,"snapshot_sha256":"4451e256e9319650b764fbd1c8eb8e20ac2cf1c388112562e9f2d87159111375","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.12750","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.12750v2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.12750","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C2H6UYBKFJ6A","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C2H6UYBK","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","json":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C2H6UYBK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C2H6UYBK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.12750&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.919095+00:00"}