{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","short_pith_number":"pith:C2H6UYBK","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"title_canon_sha256":"bc6af03c0a69ab356acf64750a863ebcc2762364dc748ae547cf79da63c582e8","abstract_canon_sha256":"474a6d34079f38c7798fa6a6a59b1bdadb24988d63d16b465525f223ded11fce"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.12750","version":2},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.12750","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.12750v2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.12750","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C2H6UYBKFJ6A","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C2H6UYBK","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"title_canon_sha256":"bc6af03c0a69ab356acf64750a863ebcc2762364dc748ae547cf79da63c582e8","abstract_canon_sha256":"474a6d34079f38c7798fa6a6a59b1bdadb24988d63d16b465525f223ded11fce"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.921891Z","signature_b64":"EUT1kVKzx2NoNyZWKXXdK6DYppDTKINEtuaBEgivfHuF6v2atssFt89e9L3oW0880D+3v9Za+7L8SB4++iXiCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.918960Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.918960Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2604.12750","source_version":2,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"kRVXijaTBdR/xKIb3qVJ/+bszfElNVOjSrpJKIx9T/VDe+5OylyaIjJdZCLzJN+t8lndrhjU1AErHKTUzkW+DQ==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-21T21:47:04.396917Z"},"content_sha256":"dfae20ef663f74150bd17da5afd8aa283e6a67e0598bc776a82e502bb1d36062","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:dfae20ef663f74150bd17da5afd8aa283e6a67e0598bc776a82e502bb1d36062"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","cross_cats":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Christopher Sorg","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study how exact Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) statements should be formulated for families of computational problems rather than for single problems. While the equality \\(\\mathrm{SCI}_G (\\mathcal P)=k\\) is unambiguous for an individual computational problem \\(\\mathcal P\\), the family setting requires one to distinguish family-pointwise exactness, witness-space sharpness, and worst-case exactness. We formalize this trichotomy, prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical s"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The upgrade theorems and transport results rest on the assumption that the families admit decoder-regular finite-query transports and that the decoder classes satisfy the regularity conditions needed for the pullback principle to apply; this is invoked when moving from the abstract preorder to concrete families such as integration and spectral decision.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Formalizes a trichotomy of exactness notions for SCI on families, proves witness-space sharpness equals worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, supplies upgrade theorems, and illustrates with integration and spectral families.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"1494f3253d017b8061a5ebf8d28a23caad6f7b207eb37f0f30550c863bcedcd5"},"source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"25de2953-c52f-4420-9ef3-716e2c8c8baa","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T17:45:21.701451Z","strongest_claim":"We prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness.","one_line_summary":"Formalizes a trichotomy of exactness notions for SCI on families, proves witness-space sharpness equals worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, supplies upgrade theorems, and illustrates with integration and spectral families.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The upgrade theorems and transport results rest on the assumption that the families admit decoder-regular finite-query transports and that the decoder classes satisfy the regularity conditions needed for the pullback principle to apply; this is invoked when moving from the abstract preorder to concrete families such as integration and spectral decision.","pith_extraction_headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families"},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.12750/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":11,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2015,"title":"Computing spectra--on the solvability complexity index hierarchy and towers of algorithms","work_id":"73652e4a-a445-4a7e-819e-a2e123411869","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Colbrook and Anders C","work_id":"1c782bcf-f11c-40d3-86d9-6f36b1706081","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1984,"title":"Davis and Philip Rabinowitz","work_id":"83a3a204-0419-4f3c-aae9-03f1255756a0","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2011,"title":"On the solvability complexity index, the -pseudospectrum and approximations of spectra of operators","work_id":"7be73212-eeb9-4d2b-b86e-4e320003990e","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1995,"title":"Perturbation theory for linear operators","work_id":"b27acd16-892a-4118-8328-359994702800","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":11,"snapshot_sha256":"4451e256e9319650b764fbd1c8eb8e20ac2cf1c388112562e9f2d87159111375","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"25de2953-c52f-4420-9ef3-716e2c8c8baa"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"/cLnfdpUCcCCUN6Ooo4ZkK+Llr54yIBtx3tM9TW5sNq3eHvQZWHzh9HaUxn2vn3KLJ0R/6P7LPuylf8rVkMKCw==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-21T21:47:04.397991Z"},"content_sha256":"06fb84aeb6973be518971153bba4dd628cb517135f249abe341a342c6080728c","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:06fb84aeb6973be518971153bba4dd628cb517135f249abe341a342c6080728c"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-21T21:47:04Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2OVU5D7J32Y","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"474a6d34079f38c7798fa6a6a59b1bdadb24988d63d16b465525f223ded11fce","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","title_canon_sha256":"bc6af03c0a69ab356acf64750a863ebcc2762364dc748ae547cf79da63c582e8"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.12750","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.12750v2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.12750","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C2H6UYBKFJ6A","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C2H6UYBKFJ6AMLI2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C2H6UYBK","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:06fb84aeb6973be518971153bba4dd628cb517135f249abe341a342c6080728c","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"We prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The upgrade theorems and transport results rest on the assumption that the families admit decoder-regular finite-query transports and that the decoder classes satisfy the regularity conditions needed for the pullback principle to apply; this is invoked when moving from the abstract preorder to concrete families such as integration and spectral decision."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Formalizes a trichotomy of exactness notions for SCI on families, proves witness-space sharpness equals worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, supplies upgrade theorems, and illustrates with integration and spectral families."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families"}],"snapshot_sha256":"1494f3253d017b8061a5ebf8d28a23caad6f7b207eb37f0f30550c863bcedcd5"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[],"endpoint":"/pith/2604.12750/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"We study how exact Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) statements should be formulated for families of computational problems rather than for single problems. While the equality \\(\\mathrm{SCI}_G (\\mathcal P)=k\\) is unambiguous for an individual computational problem \\(\\mathcal P\\), the family setting requires one to distinguish family-pointwise exactness, witness-space sharpness, and worst-case exactness. We formalize this trichotomy, prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical s","authors_text":"Christopher Sorg","cross_cats":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","title":"From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index"},"references":{"count":11,"internal_anchors":2,"resolved_work":11,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Computing spectra--on the solvability complexity index hierarchy and towers of algorithms","work_id":"73652e4a-a445-4a7e-819e-a2e123411869","year":2015},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Colbrook and Anders C","work_id":"1c782bcf-f11c-40d3-86d9-6f36b1706081","year":2023},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Davis and Philip Rabinowitz","work_id":"83a3a204-0419-4f3c-aae9-03f1255756a0","year":1984},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"On the solvability complexity index, the -pseudospectrum and approximations of spectra of operators","work_id":"7be73212-eeb9-4d2b-b86e-4e320003990e","year":2011},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"Perturbation theory for linear operators","work_id":"b27acd16-892a-4118-8328-359994702800","year":1995}],"snapshot_sha256":"4451e256e9319650b764fbd1c8eb8e20ac2cf1c388112562e9f2d87159111375"},"source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-19T17:45:21.701451Z","id":"25de2953-c52f-4420-9ef3-716e2c8c8baa","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Formalizes a trichotomy of exactness notions for SCI on families, proves witness-space sharpness equals worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, supplies upgrade theorems, and illustrates with integration and spectral families.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness for SCI families","strongest_claim":"We prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness.","weakest_assumption":"The upgrade theorems and transport results rest on the assumption that the families admit decoder-regular finite-query transports and that the decoder classes satisfy the regularity conditions needed for the pullback principle to apply; this is invoked when moving from the abstract preorder to concrete families such as integration and spectral decision."}},"verdict_id":"25de2953-c52f-4420-9ef3-716e2c8c8baa"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:dfae20ef663f74150bd17da5afd8aa283e6a67e0598bc776a82e502bb1d36062","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"474a6d34079f38c7798fa6a6a59b1bdadb24988d63d16b465525f223ded11fce","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","math.DS","math.FA"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2026-04-14T13:59:35Z","title_canon_sha256":"bc6af03c0a69ab356acf64750a863ebcc2762364dc748ae547cf79da63c582e8"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2604.12750","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"168fea602a2a7c062d1a7569d1fd3bd606c1011f04e19e201f83e2be2cfef77a","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.918960Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.918960Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"EUT1kVKzx2NoNyZWKXXdK6DYppDTKINEtuaBEgivfHuF6v2atssFt89e9L3oW0880D+3v9Za+7L8SB4++iXiCw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:37.921891Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2604.12750","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":2}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:dfae20ef663f74150bd17da5afd8aa283e6a67e0598bc776a82e502bb1d36062","sha256:06fb84aeb6973be518971153bba4dd628cb517135f249abe341a342c6080728c"],"state_sha256":"7fe8560a3c034952bc99e37082e2e17b4d9bcb65d6c19ca87166ac7ad9070ac4"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"edMtqwWa+wKvm1OKg/Os4veaW3/fAFE+5d2l4ESLFiEgo+jtqEulNEaaLUCv5drVjLH5ChPPthO38eXKuH+tDQ==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-21T21:47:04.402136Z","bundle_sha256":"a270be429546c10144fdf6a2a526129d6aeea314bdb38410bc3ccfa34ce03b70"}}