{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY","short_pith_number":"pith:C36BNTDI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"16fc16cc685b239d8677eae3f019868e35f804c4c5a7342cb5c61c0baa68d924","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.07443","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LegalReasoner: Step-wised Verification-Correction for Legal Judgment Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Han Zhu, Jiajie Xu, Jiaming Ji, Jia Zhu, Jipeng Zhang, Mengze Li, Ruiyuan Zhang, Sirui Han, Weijie Shi, Yike Guo","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T05:48:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Legal judgment prediction (LJP) aims to function as a judge by making final rulings based on case claims and facts, which plays a vital role in the judicial domain for supporting court decision-making and improving judicial efficiency. However, existing methods often struggle with logical errors when conducting complex legal reasoning. We propose LegalReasoner, which enhances LJP reliability through step-wise verification and correction of the reasoning process. Specifically, it first identifies dispute points to decompose complex cases, and then conducts step-wise reasoning while employing a "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.07443","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T05:48:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"af6755ad5a542f151a14100b05c65df71a3ce2cfbab6189c991096da736e9f8a","abstract_canon_sha256":"ae46efbc5c8702bb4f34877874f6fac565d6d20ceff5479bd75467fe3a2dd0f9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.381370Z","signature_b64":"FKdLscNO7/8yAA10wi3wi5r/FmODdqsjO03RR6HDRKBMjx7jQzMAeQTn/cD7EJpfhxFaLJUgHejL++nBZzRLBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"16fc16cc685b239d8677eae3f019868e35f804c4c5a7342cb5c61c0baa68d924","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380772Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380772Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LegalReasoner: Step-wised Verification-Correction for Legal Judgment Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Han Zhu, Jiajie Xu, Jiaming Ji, Jia Zhu, Jipeng Zhang, Mengze Li, Ruiyuan Zhang, Sirui Han, Weijie Shi, Yike Guo","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T05:48:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Legal judgment prediction (LJP) aims to function as a judge by making final rulings based on case claims and facts, which plays a vital role in the judicial domain for supporting court decision-making and improving judicial efficiency. However, existing methods often struggle with logical errors when conducting complex legal reasoning. We propose LegalReasoner, which enhances LJP reliability through step-wise verification and correction of the reasoning process. Specifically, it first identifies dispute points to decompose complex cases, and then conducts step-wise reasoning while employing a "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.07443","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.07443/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.07443","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.07443v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.07443","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C36BNTDILMRZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C36BNTDI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23809","citing_title":"LegalDrill: Diagnosis-Driven Synthesis for Legal Reasoning in Small Language Models","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C36BNTDI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C36BNTDI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.07443&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/C36BNTDILMRZ3BTX5LR7AGMGRY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:27.380847+00:00"}