{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ","short_pith_number":"pith:C3IXF3TI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"16d172ee6807056a8a18463e0b1a8a464f3896792878b01aa53cabfe286d005e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1605.06293","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The performance of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for normality based on the empirical characteristic function in large samples","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"J. Martin van Zyl","submitted_at":"2016-05-20T11:25:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"An empirical power comparison is made between two tests based on the empirical characteristic function and some of the best performing tests for normality. A simple normality test based on the empirical characteristic function calculated in a single point is shown to outperform the more complicated Epps-Pulley test and the frequentist tests included in the study in large samples."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1605.06293","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.CO","submitted_at":"2016-05-20T11:25:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"9a07f044a30091df6061076b6bc42070a337234360573c440c5a9418784356fc","abstract_canon_sha256":"025f751a842dd09597a1b1d718349b47f0a68672b268bf1a0f91bc6641a2f6e9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363793Z","signature_b64":"C6l81wbs7ZsxmilZYsH37Xa/AFMaHBCk6XvtQXjDVOSqrrDos22XZA5iaJHBo6rTDLPOcg3CiM54qJV/3F04BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"16d172ee6807056a8a18463e0b1a8a464f3896792878b01aa53cabfe286d005e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363387Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363387Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The performance of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for normality based on the empirical characteristic function in large samples","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"J. Martin van Zyl","submitted_at":"2016-05-20T11:25:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"An empirical power comparison is made between two tests based on the empirical characteristic function and some of the best performing tests for normality. A simple normality test based on the empirical characteristic function calculated in a single point is shown to outperform the more complicated Epps-Pulley test and the frequentist tests included in the study in large samples."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1605.06293","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1605.06293","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1605.06293v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1605.06293","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C3IXF3TIA4CW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:09.641336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:09.641336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C3IXF3TI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:09.641336+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C3IXF3TI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C3IXF3TI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1605.06293&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/C3IXF3TIA4CWVCQYIY7AWGUKIZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363447+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:39.363447+00:00"}