{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO","short_pith_number":"pith:C47ZSD3U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"173f990f7474eb845d6ce9b74149621382ec63954ac0f21e5a98ddab5fe62d92","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.09820","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CoRT: Code-integrated Reasoning within Thinking","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Benyou Wang, Chengpeng Li, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Keqin Bao, Mingfeng Xue, Ruoyu Sun, Tian Ding, Xiang Wang, Zhengyang Tang, Ziniu Li","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T14:59:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) like o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have shown remarkable progress in natural language reasoning with long chain-of-thought (CoT), yet they remain inefficient or inaccurate when handling complex mathematical operations. Addressing these limitations through computational tools (e.g., computation libraries and symbolic solvers) is promising, but it introduces a technical challenge: Code Interpreter (CI) brings external knowledge beyond the model's internal text representations, thus the direct combination is not efficient. This paper introduces CoRT, a post-training framework f"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.09820","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T14:59:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"83050e75f748be3edc391f7b26a12e042615edf56fafd6dd4ef7ecdcd5d5ce5d","abstract_canon_sha256":"44f67eaf632991244dea693dec069f1ccb775c2f5799899fd9552848c423bcc3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857438Z","signature_b64":"/4ssCE2+djZ7EtRHVrzw/NsFo9ioVhWzAnwJUskSaJZ/d7sgjx5KrYfRO8dL+tmvV6fQGCgL7HSXjYmgRCfRAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"173f990f7474eb845d6ce9b74149621382ec63954ac0f21e5a98ddab5fe62d92","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.856975Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.856975Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CoRT: Code-integrated Reasoning within Thinking","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Benyou Wang, Chengpeng Li, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Keqin Bao, Mingfeng Xue, Ruoyu Sun, Tian Ding, Xiang Wang, Zhengyang Tang, Ziniu Li","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T14:59:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) like o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have shown remarkable progress in natural language reasoning with long chain-of-thought (CoT), yet they remain inefficient or inaccurate when handling complex mathematical operations. Addressing these limitations through computational tools (e.g., computation libraries and symbolic solvers) is promising, but it introduces a technical challenge: Code Interpreter (CI) brings external knowledge beyond the model's internal text representations, thus the direct combination is not efficient. This paper introduces CoRT, a post-training framework f"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.09820","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.09820/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.09820","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.09820v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.09820","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C47ZSD3UOTVY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C47ZSD3U","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07995","citing_title":"Customer-Agent: Overcoming Context Limitations in Ultra-Long Shopping Trajectories via Tool-Augmented Agents and RLVR","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.08827","citing_title":"A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models","ref_index":268,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06326","citing_title":"Teaching Thinking Models to Reason with Tools: A Full-Pipeline Recipe for Tool-Integrated Reasoning","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C47ZSD3U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C47ZSD3U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.09820&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/C47ZSD3UOTVYIXLM5G3UCSLCCO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:14.857031+00:00"}