{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ","short_pith_number":"pith:C4PUDTT4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"171f41ce7c789a0ea3b4fbb640ff5db649aa60296ec14a396f8275ab3ca4768e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2608.10006","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On quantum mechanics self-consistency: EPR incompleteness claims require no extraneous concepts beyond the theory's plain formalism for refutation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"D. F. Orsini, L. R. N. Oliveira, M. G. E. da Luz","submitted_at":"2026-08-07T21:08:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"From a phenomenological and experimental viewpoint, quantum mechanics is remarkably successful in explaining effects and processes in the microscopic world. Recently, however, a growing body of literature has revisited the theory's own formal foundations, specifically addressing issues of self-consistency and completeness. As a major historical example of these foundational challenges, the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument famously claimed that the theory is incomplete. While many valid criticisms and refutations of the EPR logic exist, they generally rely on a combination of technical re"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2608.10006","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2026-08-07T21:08:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"23551e69d2cf79e256635cbb54dbc4a3e958e5092d1973e226a615106c1ec5ca","abstract_canon_sha256":"f46340fc72fbcbfd0abb435d61f34392606a78c0998c9663f77333febcb51400"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.357077Z","signature_b64":"Y4OzOzJgiKOoFpgLU1/bDL42rtwhtGaOxQ7c+f8GUg3vLotRWyQPrcjq169lcTkV0vlf+3FfKnEy34FOz4CjBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"171f41ce7c789a0ea3b4fbb640ff5db649aa60296ec14a396f8275ab3ca4768e","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.355364Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.355364Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On quantum mechanics self-consistency: EPR incompleteness claims require no extraneous concepts beyond the theory's plain formalism for refutation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"D. F. Orsini, L. R. N. Oliveira, M. G. E. da Luz","submitted_at":"2026-08-07T21:08:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"From a phenomenological and experimental viewpoint, quantum mechanics is remarkably successful in explaining effects and processes in the microscopic world. Recently, however, a growing body of literature has revisited the theory's own formal foundations, specifically addressing issues of self-consistency and completeness. As a major historical example of these foundational challenges, the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument famously claimed that the theory is incomplete. While many valid criticisms and refutations of the EPR logic exist, they generally rely on a combination of technical re"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2608.10006","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2608.10006/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2608.10006","created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2608.10006v1","created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2608.10006","created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"C4PUDTT4PCNA","created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U","created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"C4PUDTT4","created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C4PUDTT4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/C4PUDTT4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2608.10006&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/C4PUDTT4PCNA5I5U7O3EB725WZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-12T00:22:35.358073+00:00"}