{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ","short_pith_number":"pith:CA3PSEQJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1036f9120981b770c2cb7046c45c0b6408b5df99fa53369765d774caca470cb7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.02279","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Electric conductivity in graphene: Kubo model versus a nonlocal quantum field theory model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.mtrl-sci"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.mes-hall","authors_text":"Jian-Sheng Wang, Mauro Antezza, Pablo Rodriguez-Lopez","submitted_at":"2024-03-04T18:09:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare three models of graphene electric conductivity: a non-local Kubo model, a local model derived by Falkovsky, and finally, a non-local quantum field theory (QFT) polarization-based model. These models are supposed to provide consistent results since they are derived from the same Hamiltonian. While we confirm that the local model is a proper $\\textbf{q}\\to\\textbf{0}$ limit of both the non-local Kubo and the non-local QFT model (once losses are added to this last model), we find hard inconsistencies in the non-local QFT model as derived and currently used in literature. In particular, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.02279","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cond-mat.mes-hall","submitted_at":"2024-03-04T18:09:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cond-mat.mtrl-sci"],"title_canon_sha256":"886fee3ea149a4c99f4372ed6ad60a236274dcd5f42926faa12ab562622fb891","abstract_canon_sha256":"e5396e6d66902fc878222257bd866d209f985119a5e751e42e0215aa8257d9d0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.323125Z","signature_b64":"LBvzQBTBxmoESdxa00wYUQfE4+7f12fD4o3D5tVONwM7kzNmxkjAsrDFQjwYcOs+HeVTCg7ZAwNoDbHjgMpZAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1036f9120981b770c2cb7046c45c0b6408b5df99fa53369765d774caca470cb7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322636Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322636Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Electric conductivity in graphene: Kubo model versus a nonlocal quantum field theory model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.mtrl-sci"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.mes-hall","authors_text":"Jian-Sheng Wang, Mauro Antezza, Pablo Rodriguez-Lopez","submitted_at":"2024-03-04T18:09:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare three models of graphene electric conductivity: a non-local Kubo model, a local model derived by Falkovsky, and finally, a non-local quantum field theory (QFT) polarization-based model. These models are supposed to provide consistent results since they are derived from the same Hamiltonian. While we confirm that the local model is a proper $\\textbf{q}\\to\\textbf{0}$ limit of both the non-local Kubo and the non-local QFT model (once losses are added to this last model), we find hard inconsistencies in the non-local QFT model as derived and currently used in literature. In particular, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.02279","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.02279/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.02279","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.02279v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.02279","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CA3PSEQJQG3X","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWL","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CA3PSEQJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07757","citing_title":"Axion-Induced Casimir Interaction Between Graphene Plates","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.10792","citing_title":"Comment on \"Electric conductivity of graphene: Kubo model versus a nonlocal quantum field theory model (arXiv:2403.02279v3)\"","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.19982","citing_title":"Reply to \"Comment on \"Electric conductivity in graphene: Kubo model versus a nonlocal quantum field theory model\"\" (ArXiv:2506.10792v2)","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CA3PSEQJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CA3PSEQJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.02279&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CA3PSEQJQG3XBQWLOBDMIXALMQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:40:00.322691+00:00"}