{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3","short_pith_number":"pith:CFFGOYEJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"114a6760890d4dff8fd2a9c38be74bb6effa8d22d14b7a4c6c78c606ab620e44","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.04398","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Dragan Ga\\v{s}evi\\'c, Kaixun Yang, Lixiang Yan, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Yueqiao Jin","submitted_at":"2025-07-06T14:01:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Generative AI is becoming part of academic writing, but its educational value depends on how control is shared between learner and system. This study examined an agency gap: performance differences that may arise when AI agent initiative is misaligned with learners' generative AI literacy. Seventy-nine medical and nursing students completed two multimodal analytical writing tasks using healthcare simulation data visualisations. They were randomly assigned to a reactive agent that responded only when prompted or a proactive agent that provided sequenced questions and feedback. Generative AI lit"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.04398","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-07-06T14:01:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"f648cb90f0ae91033a70e7a769aa45d25d576a4bf03e25ab96c159044e127b35","abstract_canon_sha256":"ae421e94a0a425bd1ef65744ec33697696aeae7ac4223e77acb51363272b682f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"114a6760890d4dff8fd2a9c38be74bb6effa8d22d14b7a4c6c78c606ab620e44","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.948032Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.948032Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Dragan Ga\\v{s}evi\\'c, Kaixun Yang, Lixiang Yan, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Yueqiao Jin","submitted_at":"2025-07-06T14:01:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Generative AI is becoming part of academic writing, but its educational value depends on how control is shared between learner and system. This study examined an agency gap: performance differences that may arise when AI agent initiative is misaligned with learners' generative AI literacy. Seventy-nine medical and nursing students completed two multimodal analytical writing tasks using healthcare simulation data visualisations. They were randomly assigned to a reactive agent that responded only when prompted or a proactive agent that provided sequenced questions and feedback. Generative AI lit"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.04398","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.04398/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.04398","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.04398v3","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.04398","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CFFGOYEJBVG7","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CFFGOYEJBVG77D6S","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CFFGOYEJ","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25905","citing_title":"A paradox of AI fluency","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CFFGOYEJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CFFGOYEJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.04398&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CFFGOYEJBVG77D6SVHBYXZ2LW3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-30T01:18:59.953292+00:00"}