{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH","short_pith_number":"pith:CGHB5RZ5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"118e1ec73d291c8d9d1d3ebd62a66411eedf8d24059f2ee9d488a8b15da38300","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.07479","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Positional Biases Shift as Inputs Approach Context Window Limits","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alexander Koller, Blerta Veseli, Julian Chibane, Mariya Toneva","submitted_at":"2025-08-10T20:40:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to use information across long inputs effectively. Prior work has identified positional biases, such as the Lost in the Middle (LiM) effect, where models perform better when information appears at the beginning (primacy bias) or end (recency bias) of the input, rather than in the middle. However, long-context studies have not consistently replicated these effects, raising questions about their intensity and the conditions under which they manifest. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using relative rather than absolute input length"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.07479","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-08-10T20:40:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0e69c7e13fa0ae7cf29a8317005c3d5473216c9e2908f9fa57f3d665b2006231","abstract_canon_sha256":"d8158dbb617653947cd94cf8ce3b0a664b8e052ae40e11ad95083f40578a0296"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800847Z","signature_b64":"+iKQMyiH6ORFkKLVMB02vy5hwVpiKZe0+YD8ysftGP7Z8rAN+8lcukRlyuxpdNVCMx0arK/mmdbxm88H3/N5BA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"118e1ec73d291c8d9d1d3ebd62a66411eedf8d24059f2ee9d488a8b15da38300","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800329Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800329Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Positional Biases Shift as Inputs Approach Context Window Limits","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alexander Koller, Blerta Veseli, Julian Chibane, Mariya Toneva","submitted_at":"2025-08-10T20:40:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to use information across long inputs effectively. Prior work has identified positional biases, such as the Lost in the Middle (LiM) effect, where models perform better when information appears at the beginning (primacy bias) or end (recency bias) of the input, rather than in the middle. However, long-context studies have not consistently replicated these effects, raising questions about their intensity and the conditions under which they manifest. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using relative rather than absolute input length"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.07479","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.07479/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.07479","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.07479v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.07479","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CGHB5RZ5FEOI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CGHB5RZ5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.06870","citing_title":"LEAD: Breaking the No-Recovery Bottleneck in Long-Horizon Reasoning","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04491","citing_title":"An Evaluation of Chat Safety Moderations in Roblox","ref_index":112,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04491","citing_title":"An Evaluation of Chat Safety Moderations in Roblox","ref_index":112,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CGHB5RZ5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CGHB5RZ5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.07479&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CGHB5RZ5FEOI3HI5H26WFJTECH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:46.800400+00:00"}