{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T","short_pith_number":"pith:CHVLJGJO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"11eab4992e5711ce419f177a582ae2e4dcc48e3430eeb88b3297418b13b415c5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1509.04802","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On the (In)Efficiency of the Cross-Correlation Statistic for Gravitational Wave Stochastic Background Signals with Non-Gaussian Noise and Heterogeneous Detector Sensitivities","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Martellini Lionel, Regimbau Tania","submitted_at":"2015-09-16T03:21:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Under standard assumptions including stationary and serially uncorrelated Gaussian gravitational wave stochastic background signal and noise distributions, as well as homogenous detector sensitivities, the standard cross-correlation detection statistic is known to be optimal in the sense of minimizing the probability of a false dismissal at a fixed value of the probability of a false alarm. The focus of this paper is to analyze the comparative efficiency of this statistic, versus a simple alternative statistic obtained by cross-correlating the \\textit{squared} measurements, in situations that "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1509.04802","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2015-09-16T03:21:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"acb7ef54cebc45a868c852998e614ef91eb41406fce5fa9dc4a6060ce4aac88a","abstract_canon_sha256":"1ab8650bc419c39664651032b7d79ec789508bdeea4130a1b122a2e55103eaa1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684717Z","signature_b64":"aHncjOx7/VrxPpawAx6oFIJejv9lyaPouzM2OnhKb+3nreIYKJF23j2GdJY65HLahPsRyXyQJt1XzP+/uMEzCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"11eab4992e5711ce419f177a582ae2e4dcc48e3430eeb88b3297418b13b415c5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684181Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684181Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On the (In)Efficiency of the Cross-Correlation Statistic for Gravitational Wave Stochastic Background Signals with Non-Gaussian Noise and Heterogeneous Detector Sensitivities","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Martellini Lionel, Regimbau Tania","submitted_at":"2015-09-16T03:21:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Under standard assumptions including stationary and serially uncorrelated Gaussian gravitational wave stochastic background signal and noise distributions, as well as homogenous detector sensitivities, the standard cross-correlation detection statistic is known to be optimal in the sense of minimizing the probability of a false dismissal at a fixed value of the probability of a false alarm. The focus of this paper is to analyze the comparative efficiency of this statistic, versus a simple alternative statistic obtained by cross-correlating the \\textit{squared} measurements, in situations that "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1509.04802","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1509.04802","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1509.04802v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1509.04802","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CHVLJGJOK4I4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:14.074870+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:14.074870+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CHVLJGJO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:14.074870+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.11119","citing_title":"All You Need is not $\\Omega_\\mathrm{gw}$: Beyond the Mean of the Cross-Correlation Estimator when Searching for an Astrophysical Gravitational-Wave Background","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CHVLJGJO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CHVLJGJO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1509.04802&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CHVLJGJOK4I44QM7C55FQKXC4T/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684268+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:32:51.684268+00:00"}