{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK","short_pith_number":"pith:CI5GSLAT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"123a692c132fe9d1c869ea9163da7d7abdf62e7d0b3e10be43c951f5102f525b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.13668","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Where Trust Fails: Mapping Location-Data Provenance Risks in Europe","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Eduardo Brito, Liina Kamm","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T09:36:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"European digital sovereignty and security increasingly depend on whether high-impact decisions can be grounded in location evidence that remains credible under adversarial pressure. This paper frames a cross-sector analysis as a location-data provenance problem: whether there is contestable evidence about where and when an asserted event occurred, who or what produced the assertion, what a device or service reported as location, and which audit and retention guarantees apply. Trust-erosion patterns are observable across democratic processes and the information environment, trade and origin-sen"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.13668","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T09:36:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"af71708f0ecfb451609580c9b3c5247c3ba0ca31efadc605b6c464a636fd1eb5","abstract_canon_sha256":"3cb908c9365deb000a45a71af7db3a2244d349d77b7cc1d863ab65385bc3ea13"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781500Z","signature_b64":"pqzqyqhdn8wWC6ZYN2sjDEnZEuW1mlahR4rBj1db9sr013MgcQ/WGe/FbDgDP78wH81P8TYdyDZsxdNkkKwkCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"123a692c132fe9d1c869ea9163da7d7abdf62e7d0b3e10be43c951f5102f525b","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.779648Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.779648Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Where Trust Fails: Mapping Location-Data Provenance Risks in Europe","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Eduardo Brito, Liina Kamm","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T09:36:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"European digital sovereignty and security increasingly depend on whether high-impact decisions can be grounded in location evidence that remains credible under adversarial pressure. This paper frames a cross-sector analysis as a location-data provenance problem: whether there is contestable evidence about where and when an asserted event occurred, who or what produced the assertion, what a device or service reported as location, and which audit and retention guarantees apply. Trust-erosion patterns are observable across democratic processes and the information environment, trade and origin-sen"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"European digital sovereignty and security depends on credible location evidence under adversarial pressure; location should be represented as evidence-bearing claims rather than self-asserted coordinates, with proof-of-location mechanisms positioned as a candidate capability layer for verifiable presence claims under explicit threat and privacy assumptions.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That observable patterns show a recurring asymmetry where locality or presence can be asserted cheaply while institutions face costly reconstruction in disputes, and that PoL mechanisms can be designed to be privacy- and rights-compatible.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"The paper maps recurring location-data provenance risks across European sectors and introduces a risk taxonomy plus design expectations for proof-of-location mechanisms to support contestable, privacy-compatible digital trust.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"04a860d4da8ea705bf5b38de2ec49cf4c55fcfff63c2080225ca51b88e978303"},"source":{"id":"2604.13668","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"0417a363-246e-4aab-bb03-f9f1e908bdbb","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T13:16:04.840438Z","strongest_claim":"European digital sovereignty and security depends on credible location evidence under adversarial pressure; location should be represented as evidence-bearing claims rather than self-asserted coordinates, with proof-of-location mechanisms positioned as a candidate capability layer for verifiable presence claims under explicit threat and privacy assumptions.","one_line_summary":"The paper maps recurring location-data provenance risks across European sectors and introduces a risk taxonomy plus design expectations for proof-of-location mechanisms to support contestable, privacy-compatible digital trust.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That observable patterns show a recurring asymmetry where locality or presence can be asserted cheaply while institutions face costly reconstruction in disputes, and that PoL mechanisms can be designed to be privacy- and rights-compatible.","pith_extraction_headline":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.13668/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.13668","created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.13668v2","created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.13668","created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CI5GSLATF7U5","created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ","created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CI5GSLAT","created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.04957","citing_title":"Toward Practical Decentralized Proof-of-Location via Physical Witnessing Zones","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CI5GSLAT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CI5GSLAT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.13668&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CI5GSLATF7U5DSDJ5KIWHWT5PK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-06T01:38:36.781493+00:00"}