{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:CJTGSYI5XVRYJ3YS5JOSI7LZRG","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"09655a10fdb9cb94bc1d5b7f93b4df85572ab140d8d52eb4aa17919d354d1b4a","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME","stat.TH"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T09:41:49Z","title_canon_sha256":"eddef2864c0952d3405a003fcb2793d417cd6840b31a4f5aa60002df64ffd3ff"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.16906","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.16906","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.16906v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.16906","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CJTGSYI5XVRY","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CJTGSYI5XVRYJ3YS","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CJTGSYI5","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:165fe871f2e21d7b5c89d450b2d8ef719caea2868e938867a80437b24adf344f","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"We initiate a finite-sample theory of private hypothesis testing in survival analysis applications. For Cox regression coefficients, we develop private partial-likelihood-ratio and score-type tests, including a private calibration procedure for the rejection threshold. For cumulative hazard functions, we propose a private distributed two-sample test. Across these problems, we prove differential privacy and finite-sample testing guarantees, as well as minimax lower bounds."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The approach assumes that the underlying survival data follows standard right-censored models (such as Cox proportional hazards) and that a private calibration procedure for rejection thresholds can be implemented without invalidating the finite-sample guarantees, though the abstract provides no details on how calibration interacts with censoring or model misspecification."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Initiates finite-sample theory for differentially private hypothesis testing in survival analysis, with private tests for Cox models and cumulative hazards plus minimax bounds."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Differentially private tests for Cox coefficients and cumulative hazards achieve finite-sample guarantees in survival analysis."}],"snapshot_sha256":"0ece397061b468df98b62be59287fc0c8be3152306e336586c6a0ac47ea8e21a"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"92d215443bfcb80f7daed028a88f883f22923c38c985e15de3867e52677663ee"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[{"findings_count":0,"name":"cited_work_retraction","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:52:05.407410Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:31:18.945264Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:20:48.696891Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:41:56.272860Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:33:26.352384Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0"}],"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16906/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"240e48fbd2fadf1a2ff07c24d511399f6b07d4028e8146e766a609bc4f85f6bd","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Survival analysis is widely used in applications involving sensitive individual-level data, yet differentially private hypothesis testing for right-censored data remains largely undeveloped. We initiate a finite-sample theory of private hypothesis testing in survival analysis applications. For Cox regression coefficients, we develop private partial-likelihood-ratio and score-type tests, including a private calibration procedure for the rejection threshold. For cumulative hazard functions, we propose a private distributed two-sample test. Across these problems, we prove differential privacy and","authors_text":"Elly K. H. Hung, Yi Yu","cross_cats":["stat.ME","stat.TH"],"headline":"Differentially private tests for Cox coefficients and cumulative hazards achieve finite-sample guarantees in survival analysis.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T09:41:49Z","title":"Differentially private hypothesis testing in survival analysis"},"references":{"count":68,"internal_anchors":3,"resolved_work":68,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"2310.16260","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":1,"title":"Differentially Private Estimation and Inference in High-Dimensional Regression with FDR Control","work_id":"646c026e-b72f-4b56-b3a6-c70f61bd6cfc","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Statistical inference , author=. 2024 , publisher=","work_id":"3a241f9c-2e0b-4a10-bed8-04711c85cd68","year":2024},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24811 , year=","work_id":"18a02d6d-324b-4147-9d77-31deba01c091","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Survival analysis , author=. 2011 , publisher=","work_id":"ca2d4073-c971-478c-a20b-411ad0b8f4d5","year":2011},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.04800 , year=","work_id":"a63cf499-2c1e-43f7-b44d-8f721a133390","year":null}],"snapshot_sha256":"61418686a65c1cbc61de90cb29fc16a00e7614f3075910ac907fb004245ef612"},"source":{"id":"2605.16906","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-19T19:09:47.699251Z","id":"780d28f2-0474-4145-8129-a457f7adbfbd","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Initiates finite-sample theory for differentially private hypothesis testing in survival analysis, with private tests for Cox models and cumulative hazards plus minimax bounds.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Differentially private tests for Cox coefficients and cumulative hazards achieve finite-sample guarantees in survival analysis.","strongest_claim":"We initiate a finite-sample theory of private hypothesis testing in survival analysis applications. For Cox regression coefficients, we develop private partial-likelihood-ratio and score-type tests, including a private calibration procedure for the rejection threshold. For cumulative hazard functions, we propose a private distributed two-sample test. Across these problems, we prove differential privacy and finite-sample testing guarantees, as well as minimax lower bounds.","weakest_assumption":"The approach assumes that the underlying survival data follows standard right-censored models (such as Cox proportional hazards) and that a private calibration procedure for rejection thresholds can be implemented without invalidating the finite-sample guarantees, though the abstract provides no details on how calibration interacts with censoring or model misspecification."}},"verdict_id":"780d28f2-0474-4145-8129-a457f7adbfbd"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:acbca297f37bed9475e40f54db74654005919e90cb04927684bd8ab93bac52a5","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"09655a10fdb9cb94bc1d5b7f93b4df85572ab140d8d52eb4aa17919d354d1b4a","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME","stat.TH"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T09:41:49Z","title_canon_sha256":"eddef2864c0952d3405a003fcb2793d417cd6840b31a4f5aa60002df64ffd3ff"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.16906","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"126669611dbd6384ef12ea5d247d79899bda2646e1597a913897c08620c05fa8","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"126669611dbd6384ef12ea5d247d79899bda2646e1597a913897c08620c05fa8","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29.465006Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29.465006Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"8Kn+YplR9hl/9nNB0ZdKdDNqM6rLLri15sQfXWJH05b5oSmBpwfzc+2xS+zz8vZlN9Ebv5m7E7KFpIPQMteoAg==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:29.465678Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.16906","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:acbca297f37bed9475e40f54db74654005919e90cb04927684bd8ab93bac52a5","sha256:165fe871f2e21d7b5c89d450b2d8ef719caea2868e938867a80437b24adf344f"],"state_sha256":"31de184ae8cc71b5e26bbd96de3f2326102ba55fc22599db88a4f963258d5272"}