{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73","short_pith_number":"pith:CKW7Q6ZO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"12adf87b2e0a64b195c48ea2dc8dc1fecf5c74e1605cd2b2fbde38aa34ddaa4a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.17017","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Guangya Wan, Jie Chen, Sheng Li, Yuqi Wu","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T05:14:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Self-Consistency mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling multiple reasoning paths,but it lacks a systematic approach to determine the optimal number of samples or select the most faithful rationale. To address this limitation, we introduce Reasoning-Aware Self-Consistency (RASC), a novel framework that enhances sampling efficiency and reasoning faithfulness by dynamically evaluating both outputs and rationales. RASC assesses the quality of reasoning and the consistency of answers for each generated sample, using these assessments to guide early stopping decisions a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.17017","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T05:14:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"22c55c3649b1e8263ceaf21e4a0859f944265847d1e860d78efd5b986697cc53","abstract_canon_sha256":"1c8c19113ac910cdc6358bb069f45c422e1a223a0748b5d74e2d76364df2cf99"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094528Z","signature_b64":"Sjh8x4BFMcEu0Y9W9e7iTyxGI5sNwX1ywQEcSLduXwKp5y2AuNYc067V9IQcsjLqXFQjB+jDDrEj4AYk81o/Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"12adf87b2e0a64b195c48ea2dc8dc1fecf5c74e1605cd2b2fbde38aa34ddaa4a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094081Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094081Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Guangya Wan, Jie Chen, Sheng Li, Yuqi Wu","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T05:14:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Self-Consistency mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling multiple reasoning paths,but it lacks a systematic approach to determine the optimal number of samples or select the most faithful rationale. To address this limitation, we introduce Reasoning-Aware Self-Consistency (RASC), a novel framework that enhances sampling efficiency and reasoning faithfulness by dynamically evaluating both outputs and rationales. RASC assesses the quality of reasoning and the consistency of answers for each generated sample, using these assessments to guide early stopping decisions a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.17017","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.17017/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.17017","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.17017v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.17017","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CKW7Q6ZOBJSL","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOE","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CKW7Q6ZO","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.21460","citing_title":"Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.10368","citing_title":"Exploring the System 1 Thinking Capability of Large Reasoning Models","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.00751","citing_title":"Self-Consistency Is Losing Its Edge: Diminishing Returns and Rising Costs in Modern LLMs","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.16419","citing_title":"Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models","ref_index":178,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06165","citing_title":"Post Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost","ref_index":184,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CKW7Q6ZO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CKW7Q6ZO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.17017&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CKW7Q6ZOBJSLDFOER2RNZDOB73/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:08.094139+00:00"}