{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G","short_pith_number":"pith:CMPQKTXV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"131f054ef59861dbedd6d7e8e501baf99c8a45489ef34aee8b056daa9b723010","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.07240","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Overclocking LLM Reasoning: Monitoring and Controlling Thinking Path Lengths in LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Itamar Zimerman, Lior Wolf, Roy Eisenstadt","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T17:54:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, techniques such as explicit structured reasoning have demonstrated strong test-time scaling behavior by enforcing a separation between the model's internal \"thinking\" process and the final response. A key factor influencing answer quality in this setting is the length of the thinking stage. When the reasoning is too short, the model may fail to capture the complexity of the task. Conversely, when it is too long, the model may overthink, leading to unnecessary computation and degraded performance. This paper explores and exploits the underlying mechanisms by which LLMs understand and "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.07240","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T17:54:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"cc2ed2b814d796c4324b4bdefb5022c4e6f675e125617e3e2a811c39773e152d","abstract_canon_sha256":"30dd7a6ffbdb3c30fc58e44223fe106cc89f7183070381087304b29e726c78ca"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112750Z","signature_b64":"1nSSvPq/QdEnngfu2oBepvCMz0p7prkj4M/tEHismPYL7SlnCPQtGB+GbPFyuBxHLiR1lT6qBu/sCBrKzjxZAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"131f054ef59861dbedd6d7e8e501baf99c8a45489ef34aee8b056daa9b723010","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112271Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112271Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Overclocking LLM Reasoning: Monitoring and Controlling Thinking Path Lengths in LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Itamar Zimerman, Lior Wolf, Roy Eisenstadt","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T17:54:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, techniques such as explicit structured reasoning have demonstrated strong test-time scaling behavior by enforcing a separation between the model's internal \"thinking\" process and the final response. A key factor influencing answer quality in this setting is the length of the thinking stage. When the reasoning is too short, the model may fail to capture the complexity of the task. Conversely, when it is too long, the model may overthink, leading to unnecessary computation and degraded performance. This paper explores and exploits the underlying mechanisms by which LLMs understand and "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.07240","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.07240/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.07240","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.07240v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.07240","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CMPQKTXVTBQ5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CMPQKTXV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18089","citing_title":"From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning","ref_index":85,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14358","citing_title":"Uncovering the Representation Geometry of Minimal Cores in Overcomplete Reasoning Traces","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27712","citing_title":"Prefix-Safe Bayesian Belief Tracking for LLM Reasoning Reliability:Separating Calibration from Ranking","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11416","citing_title":"Freeze Deep, Train Shallow: Interpretable Layer Allocation for Continued Pre-Training","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11416","citing_title":"Freeze Deep, Train Shallow: Interpretable Layer Allocation for Continued Pre-Training","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01853","citing_title":"Spatiotemporal Hidden-State Dynamics as a Signature of Internal Reasoning in Large Language Models","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CMPQKTXV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CMPQKTXV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.07240&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CMPQKTXVTBQ5X3OW27UOKAN27G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:04.112325+00:00"}