{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7","short_pith_number":"pith:CORK2KPV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"13a2ad29f56ca8a6db75e24fdeec2227f793073f292f029dff3e33b6b58c9288","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.17541","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Understanding Variants of Invariant Risk Minimization through the Lens of Calibration","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hiroki Naganuma, Kotaro Yoshida","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T02:08:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning models traditionally assume that training and test data are independently and identically distributed. However, in real-world applications, the test distribution often differs from training. This problem, known as out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, challenges conventional models. Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) emerges as a solution that aims to identify invariant features across different environments to enhance OOD robustness. However, IRM's complexity, particularly its bi-level optimization, has led to the development of various approximate methods. Our study inves"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.17541","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T02:08:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d9781b170589f8d1e69becb61b13bef428d7ef6c537b7ce5c5fd69de7b84fe5e","abstract_canon_sha256":"7d6dc8f293ef84a418658ab5c191c1cfb50ff3f6c55b0fe9d46992370a5a9216"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011819Z","signature_b64":"iK6QKzmURjEW8u1RIIL03T0ztD/48A4aXaRU/hAOXBCVvJjBAosJLECBaY+TdTPezRn9CK/hihXMxqlaVTZaCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"13a2ad29f56ca8a6db75e24fdeec2227f793073f292f029dff3e33b6b58c9288","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011270Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011270Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Understanding Variants of Invariant Risk Minimization through the Lens of Calibration","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hiroki Naganuma, Kotaro Yoshida","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T02:08:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning models traditionally assume that training and test data are independently and identically distributed. However, in real-world applications, the test distribution often differs from training. This problem, known as out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, challenges conventional models. Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) emerges as a solution that aims to identify invariant features across different environments to enhance OOD robustness. However, IRM's complexity, particularly its bi-level optimization, has led to the development of various approximate methods. Our study inves"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.17541","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.17541/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.17541","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.17541v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.17541","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CORK2KPVNSUK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CORK2KPV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.05098","citing_title":"TIF: Learning Temporal Invariance in Android Malware Detectors","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CORK2KPV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CORK2KPV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.17541&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CORK2KPVNSUKNW3V4JH553BCE7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:35.011339+00:00"}