{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N","short_pith_number":"pith:CQIVOZUP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"141157668f3dbdb46466157bb22a74e347df49a558c455100eb661ae721985ca","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.28187","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Whose Name Comes Up? III: Persona Prompting Effects in LLM-Based Scholar Recommendation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Annabella S\\'anchez-Guzm\\'an, Denis Helic, Lisette Esp\\'in-Noboa, Lukas Eberhard","submitted_at":"2026-05-27T09:09:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as scholar recommenders, shaping who is seen as an expert in academia. Existing audits remain English-centric, single discipline, and persona-agnostic, leaving the source of output variability poorly understood. To this end, we propose a benchmark that disentangles the effects of model choice and prompt design on recommendations. We audit 43 LLMs by varying persona prompts (language, location, role-and-task) and context (field, seniority, k). Recommended scholars are compared against Semantic Scholar over six scientific disciplines to measure "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.28187","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-27T09:09:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"71eefc361b4320ff8f9125ce0e1ff49e8cebfb1dce91e4222dbe47556802052c","abstract_canon_sha256":"5e1cedaeedbbe8c237dbcd69e1bcdd6770350c7c65c0ea10c0f81897afccc9cf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654890Z","signature_b64":"GFYQSCafdBRmmblu41p+gwjAMW7XOaKntdLxJfkhG4pGt/ok8bTcrslzgD/OMPlAlfni3xxMsQPYkRDZMLsiAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"141157668f3dbdb46466157bb22a74e347df49a558c455100eb661ae721985ca","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654416Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654416Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Whose Name Comes Up? III: Persona Prompting Effects in LLM-Based Scholar Recommendation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Annabella S\\'anchez-Guzm\\'an, Denis Helic, Lisette Esp\\'in-Noboa, Lukas Eberhard","submitted_at":"2026-05-27T09:09:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as scholar recommenders, shaping who is seen as an expert in academia. Existing audits remain English-centric, single discipline, and persona-agnostic, leaving the source of output variability poorly understood. To this end, we propose a benchmark that disentangles the effects of model choice and prompt design on recommendations. We audit 43 LLMs by varying persona prompts (language, location, role-and-task) and context (field, seniority, k). Recommended scholars are compared against Semantic Scholar over six scientific disciplines to measure "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2605.28187","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.28187/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.28187","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.28187v1","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.28187","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CQIVOZUPHW63","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CQIVOZUPHW63IZDG","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CQIVOZUP","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CQIVOZUP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CQIVOZUP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.28187&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CQIVOZUPHW63IZDGCV53EKTU4N/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-28T01:05:01.654490+00:00"}