{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP","short_pith_number":"pith:CSJL5EMJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1492be91898b25ae8c6eaa6da49981cbec2c9da91ae0797d7588023a0e400a17","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.12372","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"How stable are the impact factors of major astrophysics journals","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.pop-ph","physics.soc-ph"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","authors_text":"Rayani Venkat Sai Rithvik, Shantanu Desai","submitted_at":"2025-03-16T06:22:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"We examine the long-term trends in impact factor over the past decade (2015-2014) for seven flagship journals widely used in Astrophysics: ApJ, AJ, ApJL, ApJS,A &A, JCAP, and MNRAS. We check the variation of both the traditional impact factor as well as the median-based impact factor, which we had studied in a previous work. We find that ApJS exhibits the largest drop in impact factor from 14.9 to 9.0, while ApJ and MNRAS show a steady decline from 6.7 to 5.2 and 5.6 to 5.0, respectively. However, the impact factors for AJ and ApJL have shown a steady increase from 4.55 to 5.35 and 6.4 to 9.7,"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.12372","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","submitted_at":"2025-03-16T06:22:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.pop-ph","physics.soc-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"006fbfe8343ace4dc933560e1103d87d236ac61e73ac675e376418232ffd18da","abstract_canon_sha256":"5928e59c30be324a555615c25225408b562b92ac4e3082d55936a9851d36c691"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138811Z","signature_b64":"dKTQm4NuF+BzhCbjU7J4HQ1WxI+wTcMhNhrpnYy16pqhU4ku+cg8tjG0W9SWw7mmzkRbWKX2Cad9SocdjT5QBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1492be91898b25ae8c6eaa6da49981cbec2c9da91ae0797d7588023a0e400a17","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138255Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138255Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"How stable are the impact factors of major astrophysics journals","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.pop-ph","physics.soc-ph"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","authors_text":"Rayani Venkat Sai Rithvik, Shantanu Desai","submitted_at":"2025-03-16T06:22:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"We examine the long-term trends in impact factor over the past decade (2015-2014) for seven flagship journals widely used in Astrophysics: ApJ, AJ, ApJL, ApJS,A &A, JCAP, and MNRAS. We check the variation of both the traditional impact factor as well as the median-based impact factor, which we had studied in a previous work. We find that ApJS exhibits the largest drop in impact factor from 14.9 to 9.0, while ApJ and MNRAS show a steady decline from 6.7 to 5.2 and 5.6 to 5.0, respectively. However, the impact factors for AJ and ApJL have shown a steady increase from 4.55 to 5.35 and 6.4 to 9.7,"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.12372","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.12372/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.12372","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.12372v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.12372","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CSJL5EMJRMS2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CSJL5EMJRMS25DDO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CSJL5EMJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.14806","citing_title":"A meta-analysis of impact factors of particle physics journals using NASA/ADS","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CSJL5EMJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CSJL5EMJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.12372&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CSJL5EMJRMS25DDOVJW2JGMBZP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:37:44.138324+00:00"}