{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M","short_pith_number":"pith:CVZY2BHJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"15738d04e9513c16c63d4c163f73cad32617546e9c5df9e8ec9f92f54cb7e959","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1907.01614","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Validity of the Einstein Hole Argument","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Oliver Davis Johns","submitted_at":"2019-07-02T20:04:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Arguing from his \"hole\" thought experiment, Einstein became convinced that, in cases in which the energy-momentum-tensor source vanishes in a spacetime hole, a solution to his general relativistic field equation cannot be uniquely determined by that source. After reviewing the definition of active diffeomorphisms, this paper uses them to outline a mathematical proof of Einstein's result. The relativistic field equation is shown to have multiple solutions, just as Einstein thought. But these multiple solutions can be distinguished by the different physical meaning that each metric solution atta"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1907.01614","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2019-07-02T20:04:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"be350a5b0f7096bf9be56749e0b01c0b9e31b106bc9dd8a8f0a6462fcb292734","abstract_canon_sha256":"1d6c0d6963dec3e52bbd4d6ba6ff545f5a88905419f239d9284899c8d4f04c13"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.306006Z","signature_b64":"x7ueur44SPXpzNJ60+uQGsrJZnxqBVp3gPbDf9CuKWkR3jf+B68+LpBaycghgobxcxwJ/OPBIOg1VjAKZwl1CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"15738d04e9513c16c63d4c163f73cad32617546e9c5df9e8ec9f92f54cb7e959","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305523Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305523Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Validity of the Einstein Hole Argument","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Oliver Davis Johns","submitted_at":"2019-07-02T20:04:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Arguing from his \"hole\" thought experiment, Einstein became convinced that, in cases in which the energy-momentum-tensor source vanishes in a spacetime hole, a solution to his general relativistic field equation cannot be uniquely determined by that source. After reviewing the definition of active diffeomorphisms, this paper uses them to outline a mathematical proof of Einstein's result. The relativistic field equation is shown to have multiple solutions, just as Einstein thought. But these multiple solutions can be distinguished by the different physical meaning that each metric solution atta"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1907.01614","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1907.01614/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1907.01614","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1907.01614v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1907.01614","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CVZY2BHJKE6B","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CVZY2BHJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1908.04326","citing_title":"Leibniz Equivalence, Newton Equivalence, and Substantivalism","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CVZY2BHJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CVZY2BHJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1907.01614&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CVZY2BHJKE6BNRR5JQLD646K2M/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:17.305582+00:00"}