{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG","short_pith_number":"pith:CYA5X5DW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1601dbf4764346e906a46b59f7a71989b3b9ef6feccb4aa19aa813b66f2e3326","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.00596","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ECtHR-PCR: A Dataset for Precedent Understanding and Prior Case Retrieval in the European Court of Human Rights","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Matthias Grabmair, Rashid Gustav Haddad, T.Y.S.S Santosh","submitted_at":"2024-03-31T08:06:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"In common law jurisdictions, legal practitioners rely on precedents to construct arguments, in line with the doctrine of \\emph{stare decisis}. As the number of cases grow over the years, prior case retrieval (PCR) has garnered significant attention. Besides lacking real-world scale, existing PCR datasets do not simulate a realistic setting, because their queries use complete case documents while only masking references to prior cases. The query is thereby exposed to legal reasoning not yet available when constructing an argument for an undecided case as well as spurious patterns left behind by"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.00596","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-03-31T08:06:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"79d83c071238698a5c3813adc91307cd168009a7d36bee874ad65e4dff98a1f5","abstract_canon_sha256":"d5bffffdb15cc5de5e245b5f13f9c428287bd00ba81f686d2f23618b7414d324"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.132266Z","signature_b64":"bT4pndCsveSFDhECt7Npoc5TVJdCYqzfMcKhMUwTcwo4/WA56ta8nYqEjoXwbHasz9acHXQynjkj9nwwMtBBAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1601dbf4764346e906a46b59f7a71989b3b9ef6feccb4aa19aa813b66f2e3326","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131631Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131631Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ECtHR-PCR: A Dataset for Precedent Understanding and Prior Case Retrieval in the European Court of Human Rights","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Matthias Grabmair, Rashid Gustav Haddad, T.Y.S.S Santosh","submitted_at":"2024-03-31T08:06:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"In common law jurisdictions, legal practitioners rely on precedents to construct arguments, in line with the doctrine of \\emph{stare decisis}. As the number of cases grow over the years, prior case retrieval (PCR) has garnered significant attention. Besides lacking real-world scale, existing PCR datasets do not simulate a realistic setting, because their queries use complete case documents while only masking references to prior cases. The query is thereby exposed to legal reasoning not yet available when constructing an argument for an undecided case as well as spurious patterns left behind by"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.00596","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.00596/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.00596","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.00596v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.00596","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CYA5X5DWINDO","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CYA5X5DWINDOSBVE","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CYA5X5DW","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18158","citing_title":"The Measurement Gap in the Automation of EU Law: Benchmarking Doctrinal Legal Reasoning under the EU AI Act","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CYA5X5DW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CYA5X5DW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.00596&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CYA5X5DWINDOSBVENNM7PJYZRG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:54.131843+00:00"}