{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2006:CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4","short_pith_number":"pith:CYT65NAJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1627eeb409dcc49046fa38a4e76010af27c5c4ef7453e2c37fbdb0c5bdc4c1f3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/0609184","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Antony Valentini, Guido Bacciagaluppi","submitted_at":"2006-09-24T19:29:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"We reconsider the crucial 1927 Solvay conference in the context of current research in the foundations of quantum theory. Contrary to folklore, the interpretation question was not settled at this conference and no consensus was reached; instead, a range of sharply conflicting views were presented and extensively discussed. Today, there is no longer an established or dominant interpretation of quantum theory, so it is important to re-evaluate the historical sources and keep the interpretation debate open. In this spirit, we provide a complete English translation of the original proceedings (lec"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0609184","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2006-09-24T19:29:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"c8f2b790830b5c17b3d436f926188bdf757a0580c1135e52d0cde07c015538e8","abstract_canon_sha256":"5a5bf391a792768fd4e6e9d2c296688e0d21e44fb4803b9afc3bf35f340295a0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219756Z","signature_b64":"AiZ+99NWzeMTWd75WgAvcSBgKQRxgHZxXNUoQGCAZjHHHUx2h0ypTu8Bu9sjlnJE+JDdQ/sKAZdjIJho4pBDCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1627eeb409dcc49046fa38a4e76010af27c5c4ef7453e2c37fbdb0c5bdc4c1f3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219403Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219403Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Antony Valentini, Guido Bacciagaluppi","submitted_at":"2006-09-24T19:29:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"We reconsider the crucial 1927 Solvay conference in the context of current research in the foundations of quantum theory. Contrary to folklore, the interpretation question was not settled at this conference and no consensus was reached; instead, a range of sharply conflicting views were presented and extensively discussed. Today, there is no longer an established or dominant interpretation of quantum theory, so it is important to re-evaluate the historical sources and keep the interpretation debate open. In this spirit, we provide a complete English translation of the original proceedings (lec"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0609184","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/quant-ph/0609184/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/0609184","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/0609184v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0609184","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"CYT65NAJ3TCJ","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"CYT65NAJ","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.04882","citing_title":"An experiment to improve understanding wave-particle duality","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.26562","citing_title":"Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17507","citing_title":"Arrival-time distributions as a probe of the preferred foliation in relativistic Bohmian mechanics","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CYT65NAJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/CYT65NAJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/0609184&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/CYT65NAJ3TCJARX2HCSOOYAQV4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:57:10.219465+00:00"}