{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H","short_pith_number":"pith:D3GMC3OV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1eccc16dd5e45ca288b21892f620bbe1ee29f4660ac2656c7dae61f971c7f0b8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.06474","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Prediction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Derek Zhiyuan Cheng, Ed Chi, Jianmo Ni, Lichan Hong, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Nikhil Mehta, Wang-Cheng Kang","submitted_at":"2023-05-10T21:43:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generalizing to new tasks in a zero-shot or few-shot manner. However, the extent to which LLMs can comprehend user preferences based on their previous behavior remains an emerging and still unclear research question. Traditionally, Collaborative Filtering (CF) has been the most effective method for these tasks, predominantly relying on the extensive volume of rating data. In contrast, LLMs typically demand considerably less data while maintaining an exhaustive world knowledge about each item, such as movies or products."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.06474","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2023-05-10T21:43:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"9e65cf98c4c5c66fb3314c7a05502348790f38c15f79ab7d027e00e703b4f495","abstract_canon_sha256":"22c2f69599694d94d6454b856e87aafd123de2d6fb311b4fe17fe3db85cb4950"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.698206Z","signature_b64":"MQ4CTa5tdi2WoemtdhvIjXRG6dFjDBPz3LNrGmC3C8X+On/Xjn4OP1WX4ws7NbGlzZe+5bRi7L82dLVYddtOBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1eccc16dd5e45ca288b21892f620bbe1ee29f4660ac2656c7dae61f971c7f0b8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697740Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697740Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Prediction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Derek Zhiyuan Cheng, Ed Chi, Jianmo Ni, Lichan Hong, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Nikhil Mehta, Wang-Cheng Kang","submitted_at":"2023-05-10T21:43:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generalizing to new tasks in a zero-shot or few-shot manner. However, the extent to which LLMs can comprehend user preferences based on their previous behavior remains an emerging and still unclear research question. Traditionally, Collaborative Filtering (CF) has been the most effective method for these tasks, predominantly relying on the extensive volume of rating data. In contrast, LLMs typically demand considerably less data while maintaining an exhaustive world knowledge about each item, such as movies or products."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.06474","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.06474/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.06474","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.06474v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.06474","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"D3GMC3OV4ROK","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFS","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"D3GMC3OV","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01485","citing_title":"CoPersona: Collaborative Persona Graphs for Robust LLM Personalization","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18780","citing_title":"A Reproducibility Analysis of PO4ISR: Diagnosing and Mitigating Semantic Drift in LLM-Based Session Recommendation","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.27157","citing_title":"A Survey on Generative Recommendation: Data, Model, and Tasks","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07894","citing_title":"TSUBASA: Improving Long-Horizon Personalization via Evolving Memory and Self-Learning with Context Distillation","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H","json":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D3GMC3OV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D3GMC3OV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.06474&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/D3GMC3OV4ROKFCFSDCJPMIF34H/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:12.697799+00:00"}