{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF","short_pith_number":"pith:D75T6TCS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1ffb3f4c5206cb4971de0564757df3514ec4f6822e7bc8580eb4b69d6b900c03","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.00355","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Structured Reasoning for Fairness: A Multi-Agent Approach to Bias Detection in Textual Data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Elsa Fan, Tianyi Huang","submitted_at":"2025-03-01T05:27:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"From disinformation spread by AI chatbots to AI recommendations that inadvertently reinforce stereotypes, textual bias poses a significant challenge to the trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we propose a multi-agent framework that systematically identifies biases by disentangling each statement as fact or opinion, assigning a bias intensity score, and providing concise, factual justifications. Evaluated on 1,500 samples from the WikiNPOV dataset, the framework achieves 84.9% accuracy$\\unicode{x2014}$an improvement of 13.0% over the zero-shot baseline$\\unicode{x2014"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.00355","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-03-01T05:27:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"1893b8a5648db0886f6e784d482c2c361b3597f90d1a3d34a1b81c2a18fdffe6","abstract_canon_sha256":"5e49408d8a76532bd839dc85376c1a6bc05c71533387b67671bf95276bfc7ec0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287893Z","signature_b64":"d41TrrHcA32FWGHMVKpyPJn+DXHR2Cm22zxr1AHIMUStX+Da6sSQxa8BjVsXqcdWNN5FOyOk5qnYRg9c1tLmCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1ffb3f4c5206cb4971de0564757df3514ec4f6822e7bc8580eb4b69d6b900c03","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287410Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287410Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Structured Reasoning for Fairness: A Multi-Agent Approach to Bias Detection in Textual Data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Elsa Fan, Tianyi Huang","submitted_at":"2025-03-01T05:27:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"From disinformation spread by AI chatbots to AI recommendations that inadvertently reinforce stereotypes, textual bias poses a significant challenge to the trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we propose a multi-agent framework that systematically identifies biases by disentangling each statement as fact or opinion, assigning a bias intensity score, and providing concise, factual justifications. Evaluated on 1,500 samples from the WikiNPOV dataset, the framework achieves 84.9% accuracy$\\unicode{x2014}$an improvement of 13.0% over the zero-shot baseline$\\unicode{x2014"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.00355","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.00355/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.00355","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.00355v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.00355","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"D75T6TCSA3FU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"D75T6TCS","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.07539","citing_title":"CEA-LIST at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating LLMs as Detectors of Bias and Opinion in Text","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D75T6TCS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D75T6TCS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.00355&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/D75T6TCSA3FUS4O6AVSHK7PTKF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:22:21.287474+00:00"}