{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57","short_pith_number":"pith:D7NW4VZ3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1fdb6e573b8eb1fe7168a83303c40befefd237c712960cd35c893248be6a1bcd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.03423","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Entanglement, loss, and quantumness: When balanced beam splitters are best","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math-ph","math.MP","physics.optics"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Aaron Z. Goldberg, Anaelle Hertz, Khabat Heshami, Noah Lupu-Gladstein","submitted_at":"2024-11-05T19:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"The crux of quantum optics is using beam splitters to generate entanglement, including in pioneering experiments conducted by Hanbury-Brown and Twiss and Hong, Ou, and Mandel. This lies at the heart of what makes boson sampling hard to emulate by classical computers and is a vital component of quantum computation with light. Yet, despite overwhelming positive evidence, the conjecture that beam splitters with equal reflection and transmission probabilities generate the most entanglement for any state interfered with the vacuum has remained unproven for almost two decades [Asb\\'oth et al., Phys."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.03423","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2024-11-05T19:00:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math-ph","math.MP","physics.optics"],"title_canon_sha256":"0a6c6b3fd9814d6d18ebda3035272220d719e7ea670d651a2fe5f08724d2b69d","abstract_canon_sha256":"da93f7c9fa875def7269c4759e44cc42789635e253f9df29146ff363d84e9607"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608879Z","signature_b64":"2oQP+2Yn9Mkxiz8p/yaeL9OALhlDI3cD9e5oKRuS+4JbqcTWrQmo0Nkwk5GAbJ6HmzcnVaTwL8HB65BaNjD/CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1fdb6e573b8eb1fe7168a83303c40befefd237c712960cd35c893248be6a1bcd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608396Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608396Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Entanglement, loss, and quantumness: When balanced beam splitters are best","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math-ph","math.MP","physics.optics"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Aaron Z. Goldberg, Anaelle Hertz, Khabat Heshami, Noah Lupu-Gladstein","submitted_at":"2024-11-05T19:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"The crux of quantum optics is using beam splitters to generate entanglement, including in pioneering experiments conducted by Hanbury-Brown and Twiss and Hong, Ou, and Mandel. This lies at the heart of what makes boson sampling hard to emulate by classical computers and is a vital component of quantum computation with light. Yet, despite overwhelming positive evidence, the conjecture that beam splitters with equal reflection and transmission probabilities generate the most entanglement for any state interfered with the vacuum has remained unproven for almost two decades [Asb\\'oth et al., Phys."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.03423","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.03423/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.03423","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.03423v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.03423","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"D7NW4VZ3R2Y7","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LI","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"D7NW4VZ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.21831","citing_title":"Implementation and representation of qudit multi-controlled unitaries and hypergraph states by N-body angular momentum couplings","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57","json":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D7NW4VZ3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/D7NW4VZ3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.03423&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/D7NW4VZ3R2Y744LIVAZQHRAL57/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:31:32.608454+00:00"}