{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL","short_pith_number":"pith:DFON5OT7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"195cdeba7f93732b4cd3579a449d021aea8ab5a6a487a208475b7bb144e29885","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2307.06464","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Assessing the Ability of ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic Reviews","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Eugene Syriani, Gauransh Kumar, Istvan David","submitted_at":"2023-07-12T21:39:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"By organizing knowledge within a research field, Systematic Reviews (SR) provide valuable leads to steer research. Evidence suggests that SRs have become first-class artifacts in software engineering. However, the tedious manual effort associated with the screening phase of SRs renders these studies a costly and error-prone endeavor. While screening has traditionally been considered not amenable to automation, the advent of generative AI-driven chatbots, backed with large language models is set to disrupt the field. In this report, we propose an approach to leverage these novel technological d"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2307.06464","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2023-07-12T21:39:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"2b71c3f497757f811146acfd7e796b846a9c34431b7407c7ee6c9f975397be5e","abstract_canon_sha256":"896023af2bc5b7f0b56b3a728daa30628b312f8cedfe50f86f4fb21d3a0e66fe"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886472Z","signature_b64":"BDpdbZIIh2f9ivVeSWGraqH9P42HXuWEdreUQEItf5DnPNhrCbmGnjgOgP65LjUEriCBTInoLy0GputreBm6Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"195cdeba7f93732b4cd3579a449d021aea8ab5a6a487a208475b7bb144e29885","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.885944Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.885944Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Assessing the Ability of ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic Reviews","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Eugene Syriani, Gauransh Kumar, Istvan David","submitted_at":"2023-07-12T21:39:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"By organizing knowledge within a research field, Systematic Reviews (SR) provide valuable leads to steer research. Evidence suggests that SRs have become first-class artifacts in software engineering. However, the tedious manual effort associated with the screening phase of SRs renders these studies a costly and error-prone endeavor. While screening has traditionally been considered not amenable to automation, the advent of generative AI-driven chatbots, backed with large language models is set to disrupt the field. In this report, we propose an approach to leverage these novel technological d"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2307.06464","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2307.06464/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2307.06464","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2307.06464v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2307.06464","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DFON5OT7SNZS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DFON5OT7SNZSWTGT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DFON5OT7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.12635","citing_title":"LLM4SCREENLIT: Recommendations on Assessing the Performance of Large Language Models for Screening Literature in Systematic Reviews","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DFON5OT7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DFON5OT7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2307.06464&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DFON5OT7SNZSWTGTK6NEJHICDL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:55.886005+00:00"}