{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2","short_pith_number":"pith:DHEA5A44","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"19c80e839cf85df1c24c76c08ad35c5eab529c70ec2b7aa31de57c71e108087d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.07332","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"DePLOI: Applying NL2SQL to Synthesize and Audit Database Access Control","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.DB","authors_text":"Pranav Subramaniam, Sanjay Krishnan","submitted_at":"2024-02-11T23:50:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"In every enterprise database, administrators must define an access control policy that specifies which users have access to which tables. Access control straddles two worlds: policy (organization-level principles that define who should have access) and process (database-level primitives that actually implement the policy). Assessing and enforcing process compliance with a policy is a manual and ad-hoc task. This paper introduces a new access control model called Intent-Based Access Control for Databases (IBAC-DB). In IBAC-DB, access control policies are expressed using abstractions that scale "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.07332","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DB","submitted_at":"2024-02-11T23:50:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"2ebab32d0ce76e49441415211bc2a3b4968b034ddfc0b8cf260e0cb756408073","abstract_canon_sha256":"0658d00f2cd8696af7b66b2835503ae4f72a8ec0039443ee51ef0e0061fe789b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.586053Z","signature_b64":"+ZUUHrp9g9WLnp81tqd2XCgzi5gCgLeKxH9spmYX3mxZTYSFHnYRog3jLsDzjFjDcstj3iMi95KyKWNinEw9AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"19c80e839cf85df1c24c76c08ad35c5eab529c70ec2b7aa31de57c71e108087d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585639Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585639Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"DePLOI: Applying NL2SQL to Synthesize and Audit Database Access Control","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.DB","authors_text":"Pranav Subramaniam, Sanjay Krishnan","submitted_at":"2024-02-11T23:50:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"In every enterprise database, administrators must define an access control policy that specifies which users have access to which tables. Access control straddles two worlds: policy (organization-level principles that define who should have access) and process (database-level primitives that actually implement the policy). Assessing and enforcing process compliance with a policy is a manual and ad-hoc task. This paper introduces a new access control model called Intent-Based Access Control for Databases (IBAC-DB). In IBAC-DB, access control policies are expressed using abstractions that scale "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.07332","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.07332/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.07332","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.07332v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.07332","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DHEA5A447BO7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DHEA5A447BO7DQSM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DHEA5A44","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20284","citing_title":"Can LLMs Make (Personalized) Access Control Decisions?","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.05929","citing_title":"LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion","ref_index":222,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DHEA5A44"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DHEA5A44","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.07332&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DHEA5A447BO7DQSMO3AIVU24L2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:01.585695+00:00"}