{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT","short_pith_number":"pith:DKHU5DH5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1a8f4e8cfd045d80c874256d3e99b49cdef96c9c73ae7185600f1242941ad49e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.03468","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-bio.QM"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Stanley E. Lazic","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T00:50:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reproducibility is central to the credibility of scientific findings, yet complete replication studies are costly and infrequent. However, many biological experiments contain internal replication, which is defined as repetition across batches, runs, days, litters, or sites that can be used to estimate reproducibility without requiring additional experiments. This internal replication is analogous to internal validation in prediction or machine learning models, but is often treated as a nuisance and removed by normalisation, missing an opportunity to assess the stability of results. Here, six t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.03468","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T00:50:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-bio.QM"],"title_canon_sha256":"bbdc3af1337058ea70805d01a583917d0c85b095ae44faf1906f8a9dc0d89d1e","abstract_canon_sha256":"46461f1bdd708bb1359acb03fc2dcbcdd8bbe3be25e842882cfa34bf2c52d2e1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.966281Z","signature_b64":"mmLPLaMTAP2pIuMPi7R7GUHHbzDpvL+Bj2jBBQP6Rp9uUUAHS7P96GBf9Te8GH5MGu4W6pjCKMY0RYU1xQSdCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1a8f4e8cfd045d80c874256d3e99b49cdef96c9c73ae7185600f1242941ad49e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965837Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965837Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-bio.QM"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Stanley E. Lazic","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T00:50:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reproducibility is central to the credibility of scientific findings, yet complete replication studies are costly and infrequent. However, many biological experiments contain internal replication, which is defined as repetition across batches, runs, days, litters, or sites that can be used to estimate reproducibility without requiring additional experiments. This internal replication is analogous to internal validation in prediction or machine learning models, but is often treated as a nuisance and removed by normalisation, missing an opportunity to assess the stability of results. Here, six t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.03468","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.03468/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.03468","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.03468v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.03468","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DKHU5DH5AROY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DKHU5DH5AROYBSDU","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DKHU5DH5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DKHU5DH5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DKHU5DH5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.03468&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DKHU5DH5AROYBSDUEVWT5GNUTT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:27.965895+00:00"}