{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL","short_pith_number":"pith:DKJHIVPO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1a927455ee121f62f9346e7bd9e24932d317a9848443191d2966c50d62f94c41","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.19098","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Language-Driven Opinion Dynamics in Agent-Based Simulations with LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Dino Pedreschi, Erica Cau, Giulio Rossetti, Valentina Pansanella","submitted_at":"2025-02-26T12:43:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding how opinions evolve is crucial for addressing issues such as polarization, radicalization, and consensus in social systems. While much research has focused on identifying factors influencing opinion change, the role of language and argumentative fallacies remains underexplored. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating how language - along with social dynamics - influences opinion evolution through LODAS, a Language-Driven Opinion Dynamics Model for Agent-Based Simulations. The model simulates debates around the \"Ship of Theseus\" paradox, in which agents with discrete opi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.19098","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2025-02-26T12:43:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2fb595cb71ebfa3727526d525a4f4d1efeb4dbeec082d8b7f00ceddac364f245","abstract_canon_sha256":"fb2582d41607cdf5ef2853718e7ecefa54627d62dddc2e477ecc321b332604c2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670721Z","signature_b64":"d29BkSPTTy9PreKQbt7WJGKf0mYTvRm7Ss/0HDqlYK01BFmTCjK9QRQPG6E8oDN3xlq6IZp+J/D74sgAg3S9Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1a927455ee121f62f9346e7bd9e24932d317a9848443191d2966c50d62f94c41","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670164Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670164Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Language-Driven Opinion Dynamics in Agent-Based Simulations with LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Dino Pedreschi, Erica Cau, Giulio Rossetti, Valentina Pansanella","submitted_at":"2025-02-26T12:43:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding how opinions evolve is crucial for addressing issues such as polarization, radicalization, and consensus in social systems. While much research has focused on identifying factors influencing opinion change, the role of language and argumentative fallacies remains underexplored. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating how language - along with social dynamics - influences opinion evolution through LODAS, a Language-Driven Opinion Dynamics Model for Agent-Based Simulations. The model simulates debates around the \"Ship of Theseus\" paradox, in which agents with discrete opi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.19098","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.19098/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.19098","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.19098v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.19098","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DKJHIVPOCIPW","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DKJHIVPO","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18795","citing_title":"Opinion Polarization in LLM-Based Social Networks: Manipulation and Mitigation","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11482","citing_title":"Building Social World Models with Large Language Models","ref_index":127,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.06858","citing_title":"Disentangling Interaction and Bias Effects in Opinion Dynamics of Large Language Models","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16245","citing_title":"AI-Mediated Communication Can Steer Collective Opinion","ref_index":79,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.18985","citing_title":"Simulating Online Social Media Conversations on Controversial Topics Using AI Agents Calibrated on Real-World Data","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10721","citing_title":"Conformity Generates Collective Misalignment in AI Agents Societies","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DKJHIVPO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DKJHIVPO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.19098&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DKJHIVPOCIPWF6JUNZ55TYSJGL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:26.670231+00:00"}