{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ","short_pith_number":"pith:DKSUD4QM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1aa541f20c25d0cf94b5c423c5a7bb34026a53b5a7fb9eb96819235e1c59760e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.20304","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Opacity as a Feature, Not a Flaw: The LoBOX Governance Ethic for Role-Sensitive Explainability and Institutional Trust in AI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Francisco Herrera, Reyes Calder\\'on","submitted_at":"2025-05-18T16:59:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces LoBOX (Lack of Belief: Opacity \\& eXplainability) governance ethic structured framework for managing artificial intelligence (AI) opacity when full transparency is infeasible. Rather than treating opacity as a design flaw, LoBOX defines it as a condition that can be ethically governed through role-calibrated explanation and institutional accountability. The framework comprises a three-stage pathway: reduce accidental opacity, bound irreducible opacity, and delegate trust through structured oversight. Integrating the RED/BLUE XAI model for stakeholder-sensitive explanation"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.20304","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-05-18T16:59:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ff851b8ac72ccf2843d692a59b3c5cbba4106be67a9b0bfa8902f71e4472cd2c","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7b92d0887c7c8ddd74d5ccc83977bde6fba824b8c3f98cf2c355c3d228c2ebb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047986Z","signature_b64":"O4sxWhaxONE6WhfId96HjXM5i7muwScXUuGwiNDhSgVHhdIQ531iMqjqI43QP9xibLFYZzLiy2mx63e5kYhhCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1aa541f20c25d0cf94b5c423c5a7bb34026a53b5a7fb9eb96819235e1c59760e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047524Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047524Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Opacity as a Feature, Not a Flaw: The LoBOX Governance Ethic for Role-Sensitive Explainability and Institutional Trust in AI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Francisco Herrera, Reyes Calder\\'on","submitted_at":"2025-05-18T16:59:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces LoBOX (Lack of Belief: Opacity \\& eXplainability) governance ethic structured framework for managing artificial intelligence (AI) opacity when full transparency is infeasible. Rather than treating opacity as a design flaw, LoBOX defines it as a condition that can be ethically governed through role-calibrated explanation and institutional accountability. The framework comprises a three-stage pathway: reduce accidental opacity, bound irreducible opacity, and delegate trust through structured oversight. Integrating the RED/BLUE XAI model for stakeholder-sensitive explanation"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.20304","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.20304/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.20304","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.20304v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.20304","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DKSUD4QMEXIM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DKSUD4QM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.05199","citing_title":"Triadic Fusion of Cognitive, Functional, and Causal Dimensions for Explainable LLMs: The TAXAL Framework","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DKSUD4QM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DKSUD4QM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.20304&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DKSUD4QMEXIM7FFVYQR4LJ53GQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:11.047578+00:00"}