{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ","short_pith_number":"pith:DML4MB3U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1b17c60774821883f91fabd4c50cfe324643663d52d25bb18f8ef9cc5c2e2727","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.19110","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conformal Linguistic Calibration: Trading-off between Factuality and Specificity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anqi Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Zhengping Jiang","submitted_at":"2025-02-26T13:01:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Language model outputs are not always reliable, thus prompting research into how to adapt model responses based on uncertainty. Common approaches include: \\emph{abstention}, where models refrain from generating responses when uncertain; and \\emph{linguistic calibration}, where models hedge their statements using uncertainty quantifiers. However, abstention can withhold valuable information, while linguistically calibrated responses are often challenging to leverage in downstream tasks. We propose a unified view, Conformal Linguistic Calibration (CLC), which reinterprets linguistic calibration "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.19110","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-26T13:01:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"9566c69daab6f59fd040e6539656069d1d48df6d9016fbc980a4e88e40e2ad70","abstract_canon_sha256":"0cc05ea443604d754a31b546545b3df4949a9cbcfe2a30681b49e082685da254"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.162144Z","signature_b64":"hvaA/mVKWtUJ3Pg0HhZfjIqd7rz6+fDayH+X18gYIyQzqeBu8Ke32wHqO9O8jMdIhuAN20F7KqsGBwRSrqovDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1b17c60774821883f91fabd4c50cfe324643663d52d25bb18f8ef9cc5c2e2727","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161640Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161640Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conformal Linguistic Calibration: Trading-off between Factuality and Specificity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anqi Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Zhengping Jiang","submitted_at":"2025-02-26T13:01:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Language model outputs are not always reliable, thus prompting research into how to adapt model responses based on uncertainty. Common approaches include: \\emph{abstention}, where models refrain from generating responses when uncertain; and \\emph{linguistic calibration}, where models hedge their statements using uncertainty quantifiers. However, abstention can withhold valuable information, while linguistically calibrated responses are often challenging to leverage in downstream tasks. We propose a unified view, Conformal Linguistic Calibration (CLC), which reinterprets linguistic calibration "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.19110","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.19110/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.19110","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.19110v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.19110","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DML4MB3UQIMI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DML4MB3U","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17487","citing_title":"Answer Only as Precisely as Justified: Calibrated Claim-Level Specificity Control for Agentic Systems","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17487","citing_title":"Answer Only as Precisely as Justified: Calibrated Claim-Level Specificity Control for Agentic Systems","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DML4MB3U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DML4MB3U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.19110&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DML4MB3UQIMIH6I7VPKMKDH6GJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:18.161703+00:00"}