{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3","short_pith_number":"pith:DMVIJAWO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1b2a8482cea360c10053091dd1fc8526fc9a3a2b69d88ba27aa0b7807e37949a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1408.1647","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Computing consensus: A logic for reasoning about deliberative processes based on argumentation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Sjur Dyrkolbotn, Truls Pedersen","submitted_at":"2014-08-07T16:41:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider multi-agent argumentation, where each agent's view of the arguments is encoded as an argumentation framework (AF). Then we study deliberative processes than can occur on this basis. We think of a deliberative process as taking the shape of a stepwise aggregation of a single joint AF, and we are interested in reasoning about the space of possible outcomes. The only restriction we place on deliberative processes is that they should satisfy faithfulness, a postulate amounting to requiring that whenever deliberation leads to a new relationship being introduced between two arguments, th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1408.1647","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2014-08-07T16:41:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"48a61d3bba8aa4dde7c01f9955bd6ab55c984135f8478c386310ff85afd93df5","abstract_canon_sha256":"8dbc21774e682fdbdfb4aa9a340592b1327dceb58cf717243263e68d35732c48"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.027107Z","signature_b64":"ac2LOflhaC943sJjmWGc8k1n/b+cFGmMWf6PZlfQhsvgsDV7/FGzzAy5d9snG6NJLdKTqBDVsC38/oruSd13CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1b2a8482cea360c10053091dd1fc8526fc9a3a2b69d88ba27aa0b7807e37949a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026530Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026530Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Computing consensus: A logic for reasoning about deliberative processes based on argumentation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Sjur Dyrkolbotn, Truls Pedersen","submitted_at":"2014-08-07T16:41:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider multi-agent argumentation, where each agent's view of the arguments is encoded as an argumentation framework (AF). Then we study deliberative processes than can occur on this basis. We think of a deliberative process as taking the shape of a stepwise aggregation of a single joint AF, and we are interested in reasoning about the space of possible outcomes. The only restriction we place on deliberative processes is that they should satisfy faithfulness, a postulate amounting to requiring that whenever deliberation leads to a new relationship being introduced between two arguments, th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1408.1647","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1408.1647","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1408.1647v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1408.1647","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DMVIJAWOUNQM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:25.294606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DMVIJAWOUNQMCACT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:25.294606+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DMVIJAWO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:25.294606+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DMVIJAWO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DMVIJAWO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1408.1647&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DMVIJAWOUNQMCACTBEO5D7EFE3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026649+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:45:40.026649+00:00"}