{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C","short_pith_number":"pith:DND6SABZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1b47e90039941736c498138a8c6555e099b0bf5ce0a58fe93b32b80c70a1f1ab","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1111.2563","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Paul Raymond-Robichaud, Vincent Duhamel","submitted_at":"2011-11-10T19:03:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1111.2563","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2011-11-10T19:03:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"fc2ac4303f5de793d8e2f58228145e26aab82939c04b96585844a377627e0cc3","abstract_canon_sha256":"d3e445bad82e7adcd6102163a83eb0fc984dae321c04fa6b657646c9f9435738"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.846217Z","signature_b64":"O+j/4J1hJcfTZwSkI1CY9p5EQo35KjfV5OBIq7oBccNiD1E91by9RR/b56z0Hy6RwX/nlsVhbJ2zXEaQPdoqDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1b47e90039941736c498138a8c6555e099b0bf5ce0a58fe93b32b80c70a1f1ab","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845676Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845676Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Paul Raymond-Robichaud, Vincent Duhamel","submitted_at":"2011-11-10T19:03:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1111.2563","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1111.2563","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845768+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1111.2563v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845768+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1111.2563","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845768+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DND6SABZSQLT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:26.731475+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DND6SABZSQLTNREY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:26.731475+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DND6SABZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:26.731475+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DND6SABZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DND6SABZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1111.2563&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DND6SABZSQLTNREYCOFIYZKV4C/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845768+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:08:33.845768+00:00"}