{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT","short_pith_number":"pith:DNO6TXVO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1b5de9deaef5744009ade251c3b4109cf020b3dc2eda7bef7b5e08dbfcbbbe30","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.16563","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Enhancing LLM-Based Agents via Global Planning and Hierarchical Execution","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Haitao Li, Jingli Yang, Junjie Chen, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T09:43:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Intelligent agent systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in real-world applications. However, existing agent frameworks still face critical limitations in task planning and execution, restricting their effectiveness and generalizability. Specifically, current planning methods often lack clear global goals, leading agents to get stuck in local branches, or produce non-executable plans. Meanwhile, existing execution mechanisms struggle to balance complexity and stability, and their limited action space restricts their ability to handle diverse real-world tasks. "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.16563","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T09:43:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0246bd38f3cb592b3d2c841db0885d7e5e7623f6a2fea2dc675212d7abbfc45b","abstract_canon_sha256":"6397b62ef469b039bbbac5752cffb8d5326dd57687929347d84e1fbae1548ffd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.914046Z","signature_b64":"Z6UQogcC6nCoJ82f9GlupvrOVucYSr9LIbaxEVeCdlzNyGY6DWQ1sgeAZk9MLBeC+WNl5P4k7IekSeNU9/XKDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1b5de9deaef5744009ade251c3b4109cf020b3dc2eda7bef7b5e08dbfcbbbe30","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913552Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913552Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Enhancing LLM-Based Agents via Global Planning and Hierarchical Execution","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Haitao Li, Jingli Yang, Junjie Chen, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T09:43:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Intelligent agent systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in real-world applications. However, existing agent frameworks still face critical limitations in task planning and execution, restricting their effectiveness and generalizability. Specifically, current planning methods often lack clear global goals, leading agents to get stuck in local branches, or produce non-executable plans. Meanwhile, existing execution mechanisms struggle to balance complexity and stability, and their limited action space restricts their ability to handle diverse real-world tasks. "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.16563","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.16563/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.16563","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.16563v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.16563","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DNO6TXVO6V2E","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DNO6TXVO","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.12538","citing_title":"Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models","ref_index":130,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.09002","citing_title":"Security Considerations for Multi-agent Systems","ref_index":105,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20857","citing_title":"Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory","ref_index":229,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12755","citing_title":"State-Centric Decision Process","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11225","citing_title":"PIVOT: Bridging Planning and Execution in LLM Agents via Trajectory Refinement","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07339","citing_title":"Tools as Continuous Flow for Evolving Agentic Reasoning","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DNO6TXVO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DNO6TXVO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.16563&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DNO6TXVO6V2EACNN4JI4HNAQTT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:34.913608+00:00"}