{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX","short_pith_number":"pith:DNQW3JGD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1b616da4c38a6334ac68c0fb9d0c43bdd0a9aa5a2119c13ae84de69a015f66e4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.01931","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.MF"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.TR","authors_text":"Basile Maire, Marcus Wunsch, Masaaki Fukasawa","submitted_at":"2025-02-04T02:06:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a mathematical formulation of liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges. We focus on constant function market makers of utility indifference type, which include constant product market makers with concentrated liquidity as a special case. First, we examine no-arbitrage conditions for a liquidity pool and compute an optimal arbitrage strategy when there is an external liquid market. Second, we show that liquidity provision suffers from impermanent loss unless a transaction fee is levied under the general framework with concentrated liquidity. Third, we establish the well-defined"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.01931","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.TR","submitted_at":"2025-02-04T02:06:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.MF"],"title_canon_sha256":"32a429ec56e5245afd23c5e01dfbcc4dbe14e2b5b9d31d9293b42cb59d5a9056","abstract_canon_sha256":"b6d8c5f0062f6745f759e6aa1f7aef945c429cd0052fd0ca8ab04f53b2ee61f8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323600Z","signature_b64":"GgIMJe94WEB9yGq6JDDvYdOsxP3Q5ycmIts0wc5fkUE+JCYryIEtUyZi30z9TIIempkx2Be+H0VlLDKQOC5BBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1b616da4c38a6334ac68c0fb9d0c43bdd0a9aa5a2119c13ae84de69a015f66e4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323164Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323164Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.MF"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.TR","authors_text":"Basile Maire, Marcus Wunsch, Masaaki Fukasawa","submitted_at":"2025-02-04T02:06:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a mathematical formulation of liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges. We focus on constant function market makers of utility indifference type, which include constant product market makers with concentrated liquidity as a special case. First, we examine no-arbitrage conditions for a liquidity pool and compute an optimal arbitrage strategy when there is an external liquid market. Second, we show that liquidity provision suffers from impermanent loss unless a transaction fee is levied under the general framework with concentrated liquidity. Third, we establish the well-defined"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.01931","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.01931/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.01931","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.01931v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.01931","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DNQW3JGDRJRT","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DNQW3JGD","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.02869","citing_title":"Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers","ref_index":2024,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DNQW3JGD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DNQW3JGD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.01931&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DNQW3JGDRJRTJLDIYD5Z2DCDXX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:21.323226+00:00"}