{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5","short_pith_number":"pith:DQT5T3F3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1c27d9ecbbfd688ffb652ebb49d2934f65a959da9e1a60c064e4bf2bbcb6adf6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.00827","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods: What Lessons Have We Learned Four Decades After LaLonde (1986)?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Guido Imbens, Yiqing Xu","submitted_at":"2024-06-02T18:22:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"In 1986, Robert LaLonde published an article comparing nonexperimental estimates to experimental benchmarks (LaLonde 1986). He concluded that the nonexperimental methods at the time could not systematically replicate experimental benchmarks, casting doubt on their credibility. Following LaLonde's critical assessment, there have been significant methodological advances and practical changes, including (i) an emphasis on the unconfoundedness assumption separated from functional form considerations, (ii) a focus on the importance of overlap in covariate distributions, (iii) the introduction of pr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.00827","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2024-06-02T18:22:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"b1bae2bb2b3cf63e07a39df3ffe853f24a9887ff68c5476cb3bf36dc40e6aab9","abstract_canon_sha256":"006b8ba27130b666dbd442f05e13c7c70d5a2feb8534c3830324e85a30c8fa6c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899535Z","signature_b64":"qds6O9kJDOtqKcg++3KHjyi7HeEk7kdF08EyHRN9hj+uOMjHV78dYB0ras4xAX44282phTrtpr33UrUVAAmlAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1c27d9ecbbfd688ffb652ebb49d2934f65a959da9e1a60c064e4bf2bbcb6adf6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899021Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899021Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods: What Lessons Have We Learned Four Decades After LaLonde (1986)?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Guido Imbens, Yiqing Xu","submitted_at":"2024-06-02T18:22:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"In 1986, Robert LaLonde published an article comparing nonexperimental estimates to experimental benchmarks (LaLonde 1986). He concluded that the nonexperimental methods at the time could not systematically replicate experimental benchmarks, casting doubt on their credibility. Following LaLonde's critical assessment, there have been significant methodological advances and practical changes, including (i) an emphasis on the unconfoundedness assumption separated from functional form considerations, (ii) a focus on the importance of overlap in covariate distributions, (iii) the introduction of pr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.00827","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.00827/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.00827","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.00827v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.00827","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DQT5T3F37VUI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DQT5T3F37VUI763F","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DQT5T3F3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28774","citing_title":"Measurement Induced Confounding","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00350","citing_title":"Robust Estimation and Inference with Selective Borrowing in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Tutorial with SelectiveIntegrative and intFRT","ref_index":137,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28774","citing_title":"Measurement Induced Confounding","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01579","citing_title":"Minimum Specification Perturbation: Robustness as Distance-to-Falsification in Causal Inference","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DQT5T3F3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DQT5T3F3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.00827&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DQT5T3F37VUI763FF25UTUUTJ5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:58.899080+00:00"}