{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS","short_pith_number":"pith:DSD3OE5R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1c87b713b1a5c4fa5f34611fe9339a3c857bc3b5f3a5555223839a5405f74594","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.09746","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Pairwise Comparisons Are All You Need","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Jean Ponce, Nicolas Chahine, Sira Ferradans","submitted_at":"2024-03-13T23:43:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) approaches, while promising for automating image quality evaluation, often fall short in real-world scenarios due to their reliance on a generic quality standard applied uniformly across diverse images. This one-size-fits-all approach overlooks the crucial perceptual relationship between image content and quality, leading to a 'domain shift' challenge where a single quality metric inadequately represents various content types. Furthermore, BIQA techniques typically overlook the inherent differences in the human visual system among different observers. In r"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.09746","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2024-03-13T23:43:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ac6d6fe477fc104de056034cc154a40dfdbeae7c863646665cdd14dc5c2e75c1","abstract_canon_sha256":"fc6bee92747b13af5d955606f7dcfcc48ebb938612e2bef75e15ed2e775228c2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728834Z","signature_b64":"QzSIbRAnUMn6Lljwpr+RjmhUnZVWidMyc1uYi7r2ch6Cdh1AvJNig8T+Emz+Q5X/6JUpU+xjOxH5MuiiIZLMAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1c87b713b1a5c4fa5f34611fe9339a3c857bc3b5f3a5555223839a5405f74594","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728335Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728335Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Pairwise Comparisons Are All You Need","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Jean Ponce, Nicolas Chahine, Sira Ferradans","submitted_at":"2024-03-13T23:43:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) approaches, while promising for automating image quality evaluation, often fall short in real-world scenarios due to their reliance on a generic quality standard applied uniformly across diverse images. This one-size-fits-all approach overlooks the crucial perceptual relationship between image content and quality, leading to a 'domain shift' challenge where a single quality metric inadequately represents various content types. Furthermore, BIQA techniques typically overlook the inherent differences in the human visual system among different observers. In r"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.09746","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.09746/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.09746","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.09746v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.09746","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DSD3OE5RUXCP","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZU","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DSD3OE5R","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29760","citing_title":"MR-IQA: A Unified Margin View of Regression and Ranking for Blind Image Quality Assessment","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29760","citing_title":"MR-IQA: A Unified Margin View of Regression and Ranking for Blind Image Quality Assessment","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DSD3OE5R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DSD3OE5R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.09746&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DSD3OE5RUXCPUXZUMEP6SM42HS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:12.728399+00:00"}