{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM","short_pith_number":"pith:DSGPC3LF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1c8cf16d6507e6e07f244fa2b720c07b32939d6b1d2b83e2e266f539223682f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.14479","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Risk-Calibrated Process Capability Approval with Finite Samples","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Process capability approval decisions can be risk-calibrated to account for finite-sample estimation uncertainty and asymmetric operational losses.","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Fei Jiang, Lei Yang","submitted_at":"2026-03-15T16:47:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Process capability indices such as $C_{pk}$ are widely used in manufacturing to support supplier qualification, pilot-build release, and production approval. In practice, approval decisions are often based on deterministic threshold rules of the form $\\widehat{C}_{pk} \\ge C_0$. Because $\\widehat{C}_{pk}$ is estimated from finite samples, however, such decisions are inherently stochastic, especially when the true capability lies near the approval threshold. This paper develops a risk-calibrated decision framework for process capability approval that explicitly accounts for estimation uncertaint"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.14479","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2026-03-15T16:47:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"6c3db6a47885ef26d70a016ab67f04ec26891f953e23e459aa2be25765e54f87","abstract_canon_sha256":"c199d98bddc88d22fe0571539a5568a2ffc82163eceabc945d2a74e5ed537798"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.723540Z","signature_b64":"lokWHyyOfsuM5KgkBB+t7IRNQzofP2OK1QhsyCnNHexkLibIPhQuOEZG1oXg3QNyeJCAXOL0cgWn/ioNfNh1AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1c8cf16d6507e6e07f244fa2b720c07b32939d6b1d2b83e2e266f539223682f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722729Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722729Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Risk-Calibrated Process Capability Approval with Finite Samples","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Process capability approval decisions can be risk-calibrated to account for finite-sample estimation uncertainty and asymmetric operational losses.","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Fei Jiang, Lei Yang","submitted_at":"2026-03-15T16:47:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Process capability indices such as $C_{pk}$ are widely used in manufacturing to support supplier qualification, pilot-build release, and production approval. In practice, approval decisions are often based on deterministic threshold rules of the form $\\widehat{C}_{pk} \\ge C_0$. Because $\\widehat{C}_{pk}$ is estimated from finite samples, however, such decisions are inherently stochastic, especially when the true capability lies near the approval threshold. This paper develops a risk-calibrated decision framework for process capability approval that explicitly accounts for estimation uncertaint"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The resulting formulation unifies several commonly used procedures, including deterministic thresholding, lower confidence bound rules, and probability-based approval rules, and naturally extends them to cost-sensitive decision rules derived from asymmetric operational loss.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The standard error of the C_pk estimator can be reliably computed from finite samples and that the underlying process distribution permits standard capability index estimation (typically normality).","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Risk-calibrated process capability approval uses a threshold of C0 plus k times the standard error of the C_pk estimate, with k chosen from tolerable failure probability or false-accept/false-reject cost ratio.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Process capability approval decisions can be risk-calibrated to account for finite-sample estimation uncertainty and asymmetric operational losses.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"a3792434c197dd0dbea6195b46f6211e0c0cbe842dce415ac5865b2e3c44d5c1"},"source":{"id":"2603.14479","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"5f471c2d-2d6a-46af-b57e-33062338d9b8","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T11:19:30.815210Z","strongest_claim":"The resulting formulation unifies several commonly used procedures, including deterministic thresholding, lower confidence bound rules, and probability-based approval rules, and naturally extends them to cost-sensitive decision rules derived from asymmetric operational loss.","one_line_summary":"Risk-calibrated process capability approval uses a threshold of C0 plus k times the standard error of the C_pk estimate, with k chosen from tolerable failure probability or false-accept/false-reject cost ratio.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The standard error of the C_pk estimator can be reliably computed from finite samples and that the underlying process distribution permits standard capability index estimation (typically normality).","pith_extraction_headline":"Process capability approval decisions can be risk-calibrated to account for finite-sample estimation uncertainty and asymmetric operational losses."},"references":{"count":42,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":1979,"title":"McGraw-hill New York, 1979","work_id":"ff226850-655a-463b-9b20-b4de5dfe62d9","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"John wiley & sons, 2020","work_id":"054e1346-fa1f-475f-9649-327da6fe7b1f","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2014,"title":"Statisticalmethodsinprocessmanagement – capability and performance – part 1: General prin- ciples and concepts","work_id":"cb5a9d42-7805-4e84-ae6c-70d7dd28de7f","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2016,"title":"Statisticalmethodsinprocessmanagement – capability and performance – part 4: Process capa- bility estimates and performance measures","work_id":"bcb233f8-19e8-4b7c-8494-f81cd83fb82e","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Victor E. Kane. Process Capability Indices.Jour- nal of Quality Technology, 18(1):41–52, January 14","work_id":"2ccf8be3-227c-4552-8c6f-222255716e6b","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":42,"snapshot_sha256":"075146babbaeeb20a7bc87a7573f192a904c78ce41914dfb4f95f1e8c0229cfc","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.14479","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.14479v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.14479","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722868+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DSGPC3LFA7TO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DSGPC3LF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06843","citing_title":"Nonlinear Amplification of Finite-Sample Uncertainty in Capability-Based Decisions","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13352","citing_title":"A Machine Learning Framework for Uncertainty-Calibrated Capability Decision under Finite Samples","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DSGPC3LF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DSGPC3LF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.14479&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DSGPC3LFA7TOA7ZEJ6RLOIGAPM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722868+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.722868+00:00"}