{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV","short_pith_number":"pith:DT7LZKX7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1cfebcaaff8b5950bd68189911ad417568825057009873a1c607b2abb0f7017e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.10162","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Semi-classical dilaton gravity and the very blunt defect expansion","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Adam Levine, Jorrit Kruthoff","submitted_at":"2024-02-15T18:08:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We explore dilaton gravity with general dilaton potentials in the semi-classical limit viewed both as a gas of blunt defects and also as a semi-classical theory in its own right. We compare the exact defect gas picture with that obtained by naively canonically quantizing the theory in geodesic gauge. We find a subtlety in the canonical approach due to a non-perturbative ambiguity in geodesic gauge. Unlike in JT gravity, this ambiguity arises already at the disk level. This leads to a distinct mechanism from that in JT gravity by which the semi-classical approximation breaks down at low tempera"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.10162","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2024-02-15T18:08:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c71d3dd396ade3b717d543ece4a711a0b2616482a4674f5cec30196a501269fc","abstract_canon_sha256":"ab09fb9fec192f25296d5422b79c27800f9c348eb73e1826d11f1a48b2a19732"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856593Z","signature_b64":"g5M7AzzRLXn6aCSIrHlKitcIkzgOJBAytMwOtz1hKl2yog8J0aUZAaAtFRfYR9bDMEqcdw25VWrX86lG6M1JBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1cfebcaaff8b5950bd68189911ad417568825057009873a1c607b2abb0f7017e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856096Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856096Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Semi-classical dilaton gravity and the very blunt defect expansion","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Adam Levine, Jorrit Kruthoff","submitted_at":"2024-02-15T18:08:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We explore dilaton gravity with general dilaton potentials in the semi-classical limit viewed both as a gas of blunt defects and also as a semi-classical theory in its own right. We compare the exact defect gas picture with that obtained by naively canonically quantizing the theory in geodesic gauge. We find a subtlety in the canonical approach due to a non-perturbative ambiguity in geodesic gauge. Unlike in JT gravity, this ambiguity arises already at the disk level. This leads to a distinct mechanism from that in JT gravity by which the semi-classical approximation breaks down at low tempera"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.10162","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.10162/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.10162","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.10162v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.10162","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DT7LZKX7RNMV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DT7LZKX7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26241","citing_title":"An observer's quantization of 3d de Sitter","ref_index":129,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01319","citing_title":"What's the Matter with 3D Gravity?","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01385","citing_title":"Quantum JT Gravity in a box as a P\\\"oschl-Teller Scattering Problem","ref_index":76,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08335","citing_title":"Inner Horizon Saddles and a Spectral KSW Criterion","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DT7LZKX7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DT7LZKX7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.10162&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7LZKX7RNMVBPLIDCMRDLKBOV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:57.856155+00:00"}