{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP","short_pith_number":"pith:DT7PK3WS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1cfef56ed2ffc0f64ec2e0a6e2aaf273f8368b196a93cea59a0f4bef5922a17d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2007.03494","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Volatility model calibration with neural networks a comparison between direct and indirect methods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.MF"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.CP","authors_text":"Dirk Roeder, Georgi Dimitroff","submitted_at":"2020-07-07T14:29:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a recent paper \"Deep Learning Volatility\" a fast 2-step deep calibration algorithm for rough volatility models was proposed: in the first step the time consuming mapping from the model parameter to the implied volatilities is learned by a neural network and in the second step standard solver techniques are used to find the best model parameter.\n  In our paper we compare these results with an alternative direct approach where the the mapping from market implied volatilities to model parameters is approximated by the neural network, without the need for an extra solver step. Using a whitening"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2007.03494","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.CP","submitted_at":"2020-07-07T14:29:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.MF"],"title_canon_sha256":"c729b0e39c413ef8a21c1c0a5803b013db5736b09b8fbc0736107c2824eafe99","abstract_canon_sha256":"3a69d098329a24272ef9b0f633ffe389694720a8f9af48e6dbf0ddb7c8f35bb3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426802Z","signature_b64":"fX0aFp+fdZrO3CR7eMPW3ISHnfS+J6RiCh5MVW5GVKvgIlFqehzqMBcTgmbmJyEscB4UBXvs0CT4XTMLDMV0Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1cfef56ed2ffc0f64ec2e0a6e2aaf273f8368b196a93cea59a0f4bef5922a17d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426400Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426400Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Volatility model calibration with neural networks a comparison between direct and indirect methods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.MF"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.CP","authors_text":"Dirk Roeder, Georgi Dimitroff","submitted_at":"2020-07-07T14:29:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a recent paper \"Deep Learning Volatility\" a fast 2-step deep calibration algorithm for rough volatility models was proposed: in the first step the time consuming mapping from the model parameter to the implied volatilities is learned by a neural network and in the second step standard solver techniques are used to find the best model parameter.\n  In our paper we compare these results with an alternative direct approach where the the mapping from market implied volatilities to model parameters is approximated by the neural network, without the need for an extra solver step. Using a whitening"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2007.03494","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2007.03494/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2007.03494","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2007.03494v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.03494","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DT7PK3WS77AP","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DT7PK3WS77APMTWC","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DT7PK3WS","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.19317","citing_title":"Deep learning interpretability for rough volatility","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DT7PK3WS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DT7PK3WS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2007.03494&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DT7PK3WS77APMTWC4CTOFKXSOP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:17:03.426467+00:00"}