{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC","short_pith_number":"pith:DVUUGUOY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1d694351d85063583b594a870a492ec08fcd3b343912a8787573b878ac81a7b2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.06158","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Distributionally Robust Regret Optimal LQR with Common Stage-Law Ambiguity","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Multistage distributionally robust regret-optimal LQR under common stage-law ambiguity admits an exact SDP reformulation over linear disturbance-feedback policies.","cross_cats":["cs.SY","eess.SY"],"primary_cat":"math.OC","authors_text":"Jose Blanchet, Lukas-Benedikt Fiechtner","submitted_at":"2026-04-07T17:55:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study, to our knowledge, the first tractable multistage ex-ante distributionally robust regret optimization (DRRO) formulation for stochastic control. We consider finite-horizon LQR under common stage-law ambiguity: disturbances are independent across time but share an unknown stage law whose mean and covariance lie in a Gelbrich ball around nominal parameters. Unlike the single-stage quadratic case, the nominal certainty-equivalent (CE) controller is generally not regret-optimal, because reuse of the stage law makes past disturbances informative for future decisions. Despite the general NP"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.06158","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2026-04-07T17:55:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SY","eess.SY"],"title_canon_sha256":"f3f046c280204c59391e561e30df558ea484f99d0d2f824e73f00127c29aa6e8","abstract_canon_sha256":"266fde08a4b667fd6ec81f68ed10352a7a437a4db0be6efcc1e863ea6e64e3d8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.119831Z","signature_b64":"wdrM22+a2K2OJJQjH3XtT0PHlxb7rs2krMVljSzTaBpM/MSJSQGxWOqQ3OjVXW1DGBwt0Gjeg4c/3vUd8MgLDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1d694351d85063583b594a870a492ec08fcd3b343912a8787573b878ac81a7b2","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.117344Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.117344Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Distributionally Robust Regret Optimal LQR with Common Stage-Law Ambiguity","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Multistage distributionally robust regret-optimal LQR under common stage-law ambiguity admits an exact SDP reformulation over linear disturbance-feedback policies.","cross_cats":["cs.SY","eess.SY"],"primary_cat":"math.OC","authors_text":"Jose Blanchet, Lukas-Benedikt Fiechtner","submitted_at":"2026-04-07T17:55:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study, to our knowledge, the first tractable multistage ex-ante distributionally robust regret optimization (DRRO) formulation for stochastic control. We consider finite-horizon LQR under common stage-law ambiguity: disturbances are independent across time but share an unknown stage law whose mean and covariance lie in a Gelbrich ball around nominal parameters. Unlike the single-stage quadratic case, the nominal certainty-equivalent (CE) controller is generally not regret-optimal, because reuse of the stage law makes past disturbances informative for future decisions. Despite the general NP"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We show that over linear disturbance-feedback policies the resulting multistage DRRO-LQR problem admits an exact semidefinite programming reformulation. The optimal controller is the nominal certainty-equivalent LQR law plus a strictly causal empirical-mean correction.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The restriction to linear disturbance-feedback policies is sufficient to achieve both tractability and optimality, together with the common stage-law ambiguity model using a Gelbrich ball.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"The multistage DRRO-LQR problem over linear disturbance-feedback policies admits an exact SDP reformulation whose solution is the nominal certainty-equivalent LQR law plus a strictly causal empirical-mean correction.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Multistage distributionally robust regret-optimal LQR under common stage-law ambiguity admits an exact SDP reformulation over linear disturbance-feedback policies.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"03dd003a19b958b81dee44188120ecc6101f19c60d0579f20f96d4902540e1d5"},"source":{"id":"2604.06158","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"b63e8081-1961-4114-843e-5e08d24a9e3c","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T18:44:45.215300Z","strongest_claim":"We show that over linear disturbance-feedback policies the resulting multistage DRRO-LQR problem admits an exact semidefinite programming reformulation. The optimal controller is the nominal certainty-equivalent LQR law plus a strictly causal empirical-mean correction.","one_line_summary":"The multistage DRRO-LQR problem over linear disturbance-feedback policies admits an exact SDP reformulation whose solution is the nominal certainty-equivalent LQR law plus a strictly causal empirical-mean correction.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The restriction to linear disturbance-feedback policies is sufficient to achieve both tractability and optimality, together with the common stage-law ambiguity model using a Gelbrich ball.","pith_extraction_headline":"Multistage distributionally robust regret-optimal LQR under common stage-law ambiguity admits an exact SDP reformulation over linear disturbance-feedback policies."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.06158/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.06158","created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.06158v2","created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.06158","created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DVUUGUOYKBRV","created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2Z","created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DVUUGUOY","created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DVUUGUOY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DVUUGUOY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.06158&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DVUUGUOYKBRVQO2ZJKDQUSJOYC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-11T01:24:44.118156+00:00"}