{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G","short_pith_number":"pith:DWYGLA4P","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"1db065838f78fd1fb7ea4374feac1bf1a7d971c92efe85dc852c2bedce0abaeb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.02001","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Close to Human-Level Agreement: Tracing Journeys of Violent Speech in Incel Posts with GPT-4-Enhanced Annotations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Daniel Matter, J\\\"urgen Pfeffer, Miriam Schirmer, Nir Grinberg","submitted_at":"2024-01-03T23:14:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study investigates the prevalence of violent language on incels.is. It evaluates GPT models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) for content analysis in social sciences, focusing on the impact of varying prompts and batch sizes on coding quality for the detection of violent speech. We scraped over 6.9M posts from incels.is and categorized a random sample into non-violent, explicitly violent, and implicitly violent content. Two human coders annotated 3,028 posts, which we used to tune and evaluate GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models across different prompts and batch sizes regarding coding reliability. The best-perfo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.02001","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2024-01-03T23:14:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bb502917a5100d0028201a1ceb1aeaca2431c27609804c17149920e5845dbfe3","abstract_canon_sha256":"52cdd4f27c2427cec71d7d7d97c74ebd1a67dcf36eba1b35f6ff3eead7bd1d56"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501492Z","signature_b64":"g5rY5FLjUfewrfw2xxucD1w+hhv5POIKbWekpVM3SiyAhyWP3eERw3yYqexZQw+Jz3leDoVJJNHT6bRqqI1nAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"1db065838f78fd1fb7ea4374feac1bf1a7d971c92efe85dc852c2bedce0abaeb","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501036Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501036Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Close to Human-Level Agreement: Tracing Journeys of Violent Speech in Incel Posts with GPT-4-Enhanced Annotations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Daniel Matter, J\\\"urgen Pfeffer, Miriam Schirmer, Nir Grinberg","submitted_at":"2024-01-03T23:14:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study investigates the prevalence of violent language on incels.is. It evaluates GPT models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) for content analysis in social sciences, focusing on the impact of varying prompts and batch sizes on coding quality for the detection of violent speech. We scraped over 6.9M posts from incels.is and categorized a random sample into non-violent, explicitly violent, and implicitly violent content. Two human coders annotated 3,028 posts, which we used to tune and evaluate GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models across different prompts and batch sizes regarding coding reliability. The best-perfo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.02001","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.02001/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.02001","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.02001v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.02001","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"DWYGLA4PPD6R","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7K","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"DWYGLA4P","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.01256","citing_title":"Digital Guardians: Can GPT-4, Perspective API, and Moderation API reliably detect hate speech in reader comments of German online newspapers?","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DWYGLA4P"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/DWYGLA4P","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.02001&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/DWYGLA4PPD6R7N7KIN2P5LA36G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:30:09.501092+00:00"}