{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5","short_pith_number":"pith:E3CZNPRM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"26c596be2c2c6fc05e725ceb74a0f237596a4d307ba15e00a8afeaf8a18a2a03","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2002.00293","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehension","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alastair Roberts, Johannes Welbl, Max Bartolo, Pontus Stenetorp, Sebastian Riedel","submitted_at":"2020-02-02T00:22:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Innovations in annotation methodology have been a catalyst for Reading Comprehension (RC) datasets and models. One recent trend to challenge current RC models is to involve a model in the annotation process: humans create questions adversarially, such that the model fails to answer them correctly. In this work we investigate this annotation methodology and apply it in three different settings, collecting a total of 36,000 samples with progressively stronger models in the annotation loop. This allows us to explore questions such as the reproducibility of the adversarial effect, transfer from da"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2002.00293","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-02-02T00:22:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4fc21090f0ba3d741333619b54858eeefac37dca7d6159ea6a6fc0d55b5ad14e","abstract_canon_sha256":"ed19d6cef177d0d5dc371705186b5ae61fd99988505cb40c0dd8102c53eb2220"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.198012Z","signature_b64":"BGydMc4biaWeWwMM9NhrA9oDja3l4KTNrFgOtgiuaS2Z1DoA796jhaYOSFJysZj6J0J4f5VwdN090vk//rPJCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"26c596be2c2c6fc05e725ceb74a0f237596a4d307ba15e00a8afeaf8a18a2a03","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197565Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197565Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehension","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alastair Roberts, Johannes Welbl, Max Bartolo, Pontus Stenetorp, Sebastian Riedel","submitted_at":"2020-02-02T00:22:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Innovations in annotation methodology have been a catalyst for Reading Comprehension (RC) datasets and models. One recent trend to challenge current RC models is to involve a model in the annotation process: humans create questions adversarially, such that the model fails to answer them correctly. In this work we investigate this annotation methodology and apply it in three different settings, collecting a total of 36,000 samples with progressively stronger models in the annotation loop. This allows us to explore questions such as the reproducibility of the adversarial effect, transfer from da"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2002.00293","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2002.00293/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2002.00293","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2002.00293v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2002.00293","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"E3CZNPRMFRX4","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTS","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"E3CZNPRM","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E3CZNPRM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E3CZNPRM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2002.00293&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/E3CZNPRMFRX4AXTSLTVXJIHSG5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:52:16.197623+00:00"}