{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR","short_pith_number":"pith:E6GCFOQ4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"278c22ba1ccfefac1ffc459012137bbc6d22a5357e729347554a29be1b49f0ac","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.01015","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Charvi Rastogi, Hal Daum\\'e III, Ivan Stelmakh, Kun Zhang, Nihar B. Shah, Xiangchen Song, Zhijing Jin","submitted_at":"2024-03-01T22:26:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Peer review often involves reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion among reviewers of each paper. A question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussion. We shed light on this by conducting a randomized controlled trial at the UAI 2022 conference. We randomly split the reviewers and papers into two conditions--one with anonymous discussions and the other with non-anonymous discussions, and conduct an anonymous survey of all reviewers, to address the following questions: 1. Do reviewers discuss m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.01015","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-03-01T22:26:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DL"],"title_canon_sha256":"41e064ad3d9263472e8fa7b7ae77287db60c55989870f7508e83bfac4b429aaf","abstract_canon_sha256":"806b5ca89070f70927ec36a2ab4c0b85da80ca49ec6371744e6c0ca724430124"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237424Z","signature_b64":"lYjKZB9ewXEmVBUkqxmVaQhZxQYFSeUyQFCfN+AUSWgDPwq+6iM1SImpWYcEjRB4OTO/GU+QrZhbahYjOgYWAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"278c22ba1ccfefac1ffc459012137bbc6d22a5357e729347554a29be1b49f0ac","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.236987Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.236987Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Charvi Rastogi, Hal Daum\\'e III, Ivan Stelmakh, Kun Zhang, Nihar B. Shah, Xiangchen Song, Zhijing Jin","submitted_at":"2024-03-01T22:26:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Peer review often involves reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion among reviewers of each paper. A question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussion. We shed light on this by conducting a randomized controlled trial at the UAI 2022 conference. We randomly split the reviewers and papers into two conditions--one with anonymous discussions and the other with non-anonymous discussions, and conduct an anonymous survey of all reviewers, to address the following questions: 1. Do reviewers discuss m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.01015","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.01015/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.01015","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.01015v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.01015","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"E6GCFOQ4Z7X2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"E6GCFOQ4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E6GCFOQ4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E6GCFOQ4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.01015&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/E6GCFOQ4Z7X2YH74IWIBEE33XR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:51:42.237056+00:00"}