{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF","short_pith_number":"pith:E6UTZ64L","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"27a93cfb8b9e481b251a5bfb4f7120296693dc08b4438658d25a1afc89ccc22c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2211.03656","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards learning to explain with concept bottleneck models: mitigating information leakage","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Daniele Magazzeni, Joshua Lockhart, Manuela Veloso, Nicolas Marchesotti","submitted_at":"2022-11-07T16:10:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept bottleneck models perform classification by first predicting which of a list of human provided concepts are true about a datapoint. Then a downstream model uses these predicted concept labels to predict the target label. The predicted concepts act as a rationale for the target prediction. Model trust issues emerge in this paradigm when soft concept labels are used: it has previously been observed that extra information about the data distribution leaks into the concept predictions. In this work we show how Monte-Carlo Dropout can be used to attain soft concept predictions that do not c"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2211.03656","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-11-07T16:10:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"6ab79a52ccca687e2ea21f35aa584497cd76e9ec24c19b1e6b93d0fec5186d7b","abstract_canon_sha256":"cde0e69ef73e8e0e58844fc5e3731d4eab123f295ac191714c06e7d976e865c8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229869Z","signature_b64":"2X7mpCrKUmw6aaX4r9BiAbFTXDjM2TzCeAU7mj1KfdHYO9oGAyFBVlu5D7EzsZJk2Fb016zCqp9iusQRhvDSDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"27a93cfb8b9e481b251a5bfb4f7120296693dc08b4438658d25a1afc89ccc22c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229393Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229393Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards learning to explain with concept bottleneck models: mitigating information leakage","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Daniele Magazzeni, Joshua Lockhart, Manuela Veloso, Nicolas Marchesotti","submitted_at":"2022-11-07T16:10:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept bottleneck models perform classification by first predicting which of a list of human provided concepts are true about a datapoint. Then a downstream model uses these predicted concept labels to predict the target label. The predicted concepts act as a rationale for the target prediction. Model trust issues emerge in this paradigm when soft concept labels are used: it has previously been observed that extra information about the data distribution leaks into the concept predictions. In this work we show how Monte-Carlo Dropout can be used to attain soft concept predictions that do not c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2211.03656","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2211.03656/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2211.03656","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2211.03656v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2211.03656","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"E6UTZ64LTZEB","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"E6UTZ64L","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.19774","citing_title":"If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E6UTZ64L"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E6UTZ64L","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2211.03656&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/E6UTZ64LTZEBWJI2LP5U64JAFF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:51.229451+00:00"}