{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72","short_pith_number":"pith:E6YXTNTI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"27b179b668cb0cc89cda1d38367929feb7579459c646fd145afb7b8030adfda5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1503.02719","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hadronic Loops versus Factorization in EFT calculations of $X(3872) \\to \\chi_{cJ} \\pi^0$","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Thomas Mehen (Duke U.)","submitted_at":"2015-03-09T22:43:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare two existing approaches to calculating the decay of molecular quarkonium states to conventional quarkonia in effective field theory, using $X(3872) \\to \\chi_{cJ} \\pi^0$ as an example. In one approach the decay of the molecular quarkonium proceeds through a triangle diagram with charmed mesons in the loop. We argue this approach predicts excessively large rates for $\\Gamma[X(3872) \\to \\chi_{cJ}\\pi^0]$ unless both charged and neutral mesons are included and a cancellation between these contributions is arranged to suppress the decay rates. This cancellation occurs naturally if the $X("},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1503.02719","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2015-03-09T22:43:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"26f73368d5a7bb05e7ff7046ded31c312039b8a787e7b2fda46518bbe7047688","abstract_canon_sha256":"6e59a3c8ce90d3293dd791f1ce34632b37b4748aefa1baaca2e41684093b0fde"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351895Z","signature_b64":"PAGWiKzS5XUyvPypEGGBsUfdtNcI5VnyhqVN+GKtyj2vUhTOARahAm3hQ1wSCR9TsWGmTGo+6frVso3eWMB/AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"27b179b668cb0cc89cda1d38367929feb7579459c646fd145afb7b8030adfda5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351470Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351470Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hadronic Loops versus Factorization in EFT calculations of $X(3872) \\to \\chi_{cJ} \\pi^0$","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Thomas Mehen (Duke U.)","submitted_at":"2015-03-09T22:43:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare two existing approaches to calculating the decay of molecular quarkonium states to conventional quarkonia in effective field theory, using $X(3872) \\to \\chi_{cJ} \\pi^0$ as an example. In one approach the decay of the molecular quarkonium proceeds through a triangle diagram with charmed mesons in the loop. We argue this approach predicts excessively large rates for $\\Gamma[X(3872) \\to \\chi_{cJ}\\pi^0]$ unless both charged and neutral mesons are included and a cancellation between these contributions is arranged to suppress the decay rates. This cancellation occurs naturally if the $X("},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1503.02719","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1503.02719","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1503.02719v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1503.02719","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"E6YXTNTIZMGM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:19.899920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:19.899920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"E6YXTNTI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:19.899920+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11646","citing_title":"All-charm tetraquarks at hadron colliders: A high-precision fragmentation perspective","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10944","citing_title":"Study of $\\chi_{cJ}\\to \\eta \\eta \\eta^\\prime$ via intermediate charmed meson loop mechanisms and its implications for non-observation of $\\eta_1(1855)$ in $\\chi_{cJ}$ decays","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72","json":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E6YXTNTI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E6YXTNTI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1503.02719&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/E6YXTNTIZMGMRHG2DU4DM6JJ72/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351533+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:34:50.351533+00:00"}