{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL","short_pith_number":"pith:E7H2S6GT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"27cfa978d313292dbb869329a2ce8f8ad192f9b6bf26e3dd5ce23054805b92ba","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.17003","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Safety Layers in Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Security","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Lan Zhang, Liuyi Yao, Shen Li, Yaliang Li","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T04:35:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Aligned LLMs are secure, capable of recognizing and refusing to answer malicious questions. However, the role of internal parameters in maintaining such security is not well understood yet, further these models can be vulnerable to security degradation when subjected to fine-tuning attacks. To address these challenges, our work uncovers the mechanism behind security in aligned LLMs at the parameter level, identifying a small set of contiguous layers in the middle of the model that are crucial for distinguishing malicious queries from normal ones, referred to as ``safety layers\". We first confi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.17003","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T04:35:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"aae438b7dc71a951e1600fc129acd7be4f8b51cbb522ec305410deaf2aa0c66b","abstract_canon_sha256":"72c267d07a8b897b48768a4635629556d9f4a24fcf529eb0fec3ed35c48ca942"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.125120Z","signature_b64":"+XYOdlOvKDuIzTIiDY30pRaqPbkPJXYPwbkyvrKmgxCrzwMs/mIbwuK2YBBpc2SK/yRw8YJL5r1WUGg2Y8JGBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"27cfa978d313292dbb869329a2ce8f8ad192f9b6bf26e3dd5ce23054805b92ba","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124584Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124584Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Safety Layers in Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Security","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Lan Zhang, Liuyi Yao, Shen Li, Yaliang Li","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T04:35:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Aligned LLMs are secure, capable of recognizing and refusing to answer malicious questions. However, the role of internal parameters in maintaining such security is not well understood yet, further these models can be vulnerable to security degradation when subjected to fine-tuning attacks. To address these challenges, our work uncovers the mechanism behind security in aligned LLMs at the parameter level, identifying a small set of contiguous layers in the middle of the model that are crucial for distinguishing malicious queries from normal ones, referred to as ``safety layers\". We first confi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.17003","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.17003/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.17003","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.17003v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.17003","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"E7H2S6GTCMUS","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4G","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"E7H2S6GT","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":13,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07335","citing_title":"Defending Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Manifold Trajectory Kinetics","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28153","citing_title":"Robust Harmful Features Under Jailbreak Attacks: Mechanistic Evidence from Attention Head Specialization in Large Language Models","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28153","citing_title":"Robust Harmful Features Under Jailbreak Attacks: Mechanistic Evidence from Attention Head Specialization in Large Language Models","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.15980","citing_title":"Do Activation Monitors Survive Model Updates? Benchmarking, Predicting, and Repairing Activation-Monitor Staleness","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2409.18169","citing_title":"Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.06516","citing_title":"You Had One Job: Per-Task Quantization Using LLMs' Hidden Representations","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.15853","citing_title":"A Lightweight Explainable Guardrail for Prompt Safety","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14514","citing_title":"Defenses at Odds: Measuring and Explaining Defense Conflicts in Large Language Models","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10998","citing_title":"Few-Shot Truly Benign DPO Attack for Jailbreaking LLMs","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11663","citing_title":"Why Do Large Language Models Generate Harmful Content?","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.12384","citing_title":"Preventing Safety Drift in Large Language Models via Coupled Weight and Activation Constraints","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06247","citing_title":"SALLIE: Safeguarding Against Latent Language & Image Exploits","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18519","citing_title":"LLM Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Content with Internal Representations","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E7H2S6GT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/E7H2S6GT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.17003&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/E7H2S6GTCMUS3O4GSMU2FTUPRL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:11.124647+00:00"}