{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF","short_pith_number":"pith:EC2E2KBQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"20b44d2830a19e2280c63ff32f4a2b194deaf17fd4b49113a3fab6f92f6eee7e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2203.15731","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Equivalences between different forms of the Kakeya conjecture and duality of Hausdorff and packing dimensions for additive complements","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.CA","math.NT"],"primary_cat":"math.MG","authors_text":"Andr\\'as M\\'ath\\'e, Tam\\'as Keleti","submitted_at":"2022-03-29T16:41:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Kakeya conjecture is generally formulated as one the following statements: every compact/Borel/arbitrary subset of ${\\mathbb R}^n$ that contains a (unit) line segment in every direction has Hausdorff dimension $n$; or, sometimes, that every closed/Borel/arbitrary subset of ${\\mathbb R}^n$ that contains a full line in every direction has Hausdorff dimension $n$. These statements are generally expected to be equivalent. Moreover, the condition that the set contains a line (segment) in every direction is often relaxed by requiring a line (segment) for a \"large\" set of directions only, where l"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2203.15731","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.MG","submitted_at":"2022-03-29T16:41:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.CA","math.NT"],"title_canon_sha256":"752ddfcc15046c53dde239fb04a7df6f072b15a48a3d4c987f1b3b9568313d9d","abstract_canon_sha256":"84600b4ff894c121c097f364e686e36a4874b6c65a1932a9fe52fbe09ebbb603"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.504265Z","signature_b64":"xePhda7C0DUwTL0dM2PSbL0uBOM3j0PxnS1p4uH7XrrKOnLfsH0qotObbPMP7sQqqSKfu6K/2wvhJWMCDm2VBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"20b44d2830a19e2280c63ff32f4a2b194deaf17fd4b49113a3fab6f92f6eee7e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503798Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503798Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Equivalences between different forms of the Kakeya conjecture and duality of Hausdorff and packing dimensions for additive complements","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.CA","math.NT"],"primary_cat":"math.MG","authors_text":"Andr\\'as M\\'ath\\'e, Tam\\'as Keleti","submitted_at":"2022-03-29T16:41:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Kakeya conjecture is generally formulated as one the following statements: every compact/Borel/arbitrary subset of ${\\mathbb R}^n$ that contains a (unit) line segment in every direction has Hausdorff dimension $n$; or, sometimes, that every closed/Borel/arbitrary subset of ${\\mathbb R}^n$ that contains a full line in every direction has Hausdorff dimension $n$. These statements are generally expected to be equivalent. Moreover, the condition that the set contains a line (segment) in every direction is often relaxed by requiring a line (segment) for a \"large\" set of directions only, where l"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2203.15731","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2203.15731/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2203.15731","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2203.15731v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2203.15731","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EC2E2KBQUGPC","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGG","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EC2E2KBQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21668","citing_title":"Fourier analytic variants of the Furstenberg and Kakeya problems","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EC2E2KBQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EC2E2KBQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2203.15731&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EC2E2KBQUGPCFAGGH7ZS6SRLDF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:31:03.503855+00:00"}