{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2009:ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J","short_pith_number":"pith:ECPJ4IBZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"209e9e20397566985e81d67babafa0e27c43c7647a736283ef98a139610ebad0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0906.2633","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Non-perturbative comparison of QCD effective charges","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, J. Papavassiliou, J. Rodriguez-Quintero","submitted_at":"2009-06-15T08:41:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the non-perturbative behavior of two versions of the QCD effective charge, one obtained from the pinch technique gluon self-energy, and one from the ghost-gluon vertex. Despite their distinct theoretical origin, due to a fundamental identity relating various of the ingredients appearing in their respective definitions, the two effective charges are almost identical in the entire range of physical momenta, and coincide exactly in the deep infrared, where they freeze at a common finite value. Specifically, the dressing function of the ghost propagator is related to the two form factors "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0906.2633","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2009-06-15T08:41:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8d4e87a7bf9ca4823d948d35f8a6cc7f0e786b969e466cbc81d96c90d358b99f","abstract_canon_sha256":"aca45055390c69627f769960fc121503d98edf5069e9ef8c047daf3725346692"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.472243Z","signature_b64":"yqqEiBsr73HEMOFIrxejD6mjYLX7/aOg3rB08cIEwbTLvghBT4iR4dmTIC6Lf5lKlo9hvZ9PIRngLqGby5MhCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"209e9e20397566985e81d67babafa0e27c43c7647a736283ef98a139610ebad0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471917Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471917Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Non-perturbative comparison of QCD effective charges","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, J. Papavassiliou, J. Rodriguez-Quintero","submitted_at":"2009-06-15T08:41:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the non-perturbative behavior of two versions of the QCD effective charge, one obtained from the pinch technique gluon self-energy, and one from the ghost-gluon vertex. Despite their distinct theoretical origin, due to a fundamental identity relating various of the ingredients appearing in their respective definitions, the two effective charges are almost identical in the entire range of physical momenta, and coincide exactly in the deep infrared, where they freeze at a common finite value. Specifically, the dressing function of the ghost propagator is related to the two form factors "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0906.2633","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/0906.2633/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0906.2633","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0906.2633v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0906.2633","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ECPJ4IBZOVTJ","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ECPJ4IBZ","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1908.03723","citing_title":"Radiative parton energy loss and baryon stopping in $AA$ collisions","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ECPJ4IBZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ECPJ4IBZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0906.2633&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ECPJ4IBZOVTJQXUB2Z52XL5A4J/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T16:01:52.471968+00:00"}