{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC","short_pith_number":"pith:EDEO3QNY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"20c8edc1b8a93731cfa06f9163fce308960c03a864aaf0e6365e6cbd8b92200f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.28675","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why Aggregate Accuracy is Inadequate for Evaluating Fairness in Law Enforcement Facial Recognition Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Khalid Adnan Alsayed","submitted_at":"2026-03-30T16:56:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Facial recognition systems are increasingly deployed in law enforcement and security contexts, where algorithmic decisions can carry significant societal consequences. Despite high reported accuracy, growing evidence demonstrates that such systems often exhibit uneven performance across demographic groups, leading to disproportionate error rates and potential harm. This paper argues that aggregate accuracy is an insufficient metric for evaluating the fairness and reliability of facial recognition systems in high-stakes environments. Through analysis of subgroup-level error distribution, includ"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.28675","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-03-30T16:56:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"924120610783df7d0016fbf116662be793e24e52647d84dd89c1a8a69956b0b0","abstract_canon_sha256":"34e060377ce5c0deb5c19b624ec9357f2a7b25e680f7e67c329cda398b67a51a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.136501Z","signature_b64":"hZw8yU6Isj4oD5PgjUzsepgsuGK4CpPdI39PzPWQgcd9gJWOx55N8KoQL4+XMH0iC9Sm9GhA7hRMwQQI2cD4Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"20c8edc1b8a93731cfa06f9163fce308960c03a864aaf0e6365e6cbd8b92200f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135637Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135637Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why Aggregate Accuracy is Inadequate for Evaluating Fairness in Law Enforcement Facial Recognition Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Khalid Adnan Alsayed","submitted_at":"2026-03-30T16:56:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Facial recognition systems are increasingly deployed in law enforcement and security contexts, where algorithmic decisions can carry significant societal consequences. Despite high reported accuracy, growing evidence demonstrates that such systems often exhibit uneven performance across demographic groups, leading to disproportionate error rates and potential harm. This paper argues that aggregate accuracy is an insufficient metric for evaluating the fairness and reliability of facial recognition systems in high-stakes environments. Through analysis of subgroup-level error distribution, includ"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2603.28675","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2603.28675/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.28675","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.28675v2","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.28675","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EDEO3QNYVE3T","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5A","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EDEO3QNY","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27827","citing_title":"Operational AI Deployment Assurance: Governance-State Orchestration Under Threshold-Sensitive Deployment Conditions -- A Governance Framework for High-Stakes AI Systems","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EDEO3QNY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EDEO3QNY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.28675&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EDEO3QNYVE3TDT5AN6IWH7HDBC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:25.135755+00:00"}