{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z","short_pith_number":"pith:EDQJ4N2Y","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"20e09e375821b5c1a366e4dc91dee4e67494270d466e8720b68eaeb2128e5482","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1603.07556","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The interplay between conformity and anticonformity and its polarizing effect on society","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Janusz Szwabi\\'nski, Patryk Siedlecki, Tomasz Weron","submitted_at":"2016-03-24T13:04:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Simmering debates leading to polarization are observed in many domains. Although empirical findings show a strong correlation between this phenomenon and modularity of a social network, still little is known about the actual mechanisms driving communities to conflicting opinions. In this paper, we used an agent-based model to check if the polarization may be induced by a competition between two types of social response: conformity and anticonformity. The proposed model builds on the q-voter model (Castellano et al. 2009b) and uses a double-clique topology in order to capture segmentation of a "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1603.07556","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2016-03-24T13:04:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"24d130bb2cb22c39a2fec3445fe52174e5457630238ace5629cc152c2904d3c4","abstract_canon_sha256":"8fdd544f7d6d80be392e5a6124c32109f1cbbf6102567346dd5dd404e7401392"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.299047Z","signature_b64":"ra+CBbjwpGia4eLINpbLuqY9vp7DWnXgZFNQFVvJDFsFRwucORqfIxiu4E4ZSWqxbfRbKDg9Kx9A0lSQUzWBDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"20e09e375821b5c1a366e4dc91dee4e67494270d466e8720b68eaeb2128e5482","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298435Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298435Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The interplay between conformity and anticonformity and its polarizing effect on society","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Janusz Szwabi\\'nski, Patryk Siedlecki, Tomasz Weron","submitted_at":"2016-03-24T13:04:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Simmering debates leading to polarization are observed in many domains. Although empirical findings show a strong correlation between this phenomenon and modularity of a social network, still little is known about the actual mechanisms driving communities to conflicting opinions. In this paper, we used an agent-based model to check if the polarization may be induced by a competition between two types of social response: conformity and anticonformity. The proposed model builds on the q-voter model (Castellano et al. 2009b) and uses a double-clique topology in order to capture segmentation of a "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1603.07556","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1603.07556","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298544+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1603.07556v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298544+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1603.07556","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298544+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EDQJ4N2YEG24","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EDQJ4N2Y","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26601","citing_title":"Quo vadis, stochastic thermodynamics?","ref_index":234,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EDQJ4N2Y"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EDQJ4N2Y","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1603.07556&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EDQJ4N2YEG24DI3G4TOJDXXE4Z/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298544+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:56:46.298544+00:00"}